Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30284041›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019

Validation of dynamic random dot stereotests in pediatric vision screening.

Anna Budai, András Czigler, Eszter Mikó-Baráth, Vanda A Nemes, Gábor Horváth, Ágota Pusztai, David P Piñero, Gábor Jandó

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multifaceted Amblyopia Screening with blinq, 2WIN, and PDI Check.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna BudaiInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs, Medical School, Szigeti út 12., Pécs, 7624, Hungary.
András CziglerInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs, Medical School, Szigeti út 12., Pécs, 7624, Hungary.
Eszter Mikó-BaráthInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs, Medical School, Szigeti út 12., Pécs, 7624, Hungary.
Vanda A NemesInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs, Medical School, Szigeti út 12., Pécs, 7624, Hungary.
Gábor HorváthInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs, Medical School, Szigeti út 12., Pécs, 7624, Hungary.
Ágota PusztaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pécs, Medical School, Rákóczi út 2., Pécs, 7623, Hungary.
David P PiñeroDepartment of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Carr. San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
Gábor JandóInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs, Medical School, Szigeti út 12., Pécs, 7624, Hungary. gabor.jando@aok.pte.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3809-890X
University of Pecs · HUUniversity of Alicante · ES

Funding

Comprehensive Development for Implementing Smart Specialization Strategies at the University of Pécs, and by the European Union, co-financed by the European Social Fund EFOP-3.6.1.-16-2016-00004Hungarian Brain Research Program KTIA _NAP_13-1-2013-0001OTKA OTKA K108747PTE AOK PTE AOK-KA-2017-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStereo vision tests are widely used in the clinical practice for screening amblyopia and amblyogenic conditions. According to literature, none of these tests seems to be suitable to be used alone as a simple and reliable tool. There has been a growing interest in developing new types of stereo vision tests, with sufficient sensitivity to detect amblyopia. This new generation of assessment tools should be computer based, and their reliability must be statistically warranted. The present study reports the clinical evaluation of a screening system based on random dot stereograms using a tablet as display. Specifically, a dynamic random dot stereotest with binocularly detectable Snellen-E optotype (DRDSE) was used and compared with the Lang II stereotest.

methodsA total of 141 children (aged 4-14, mean age 8.9) were examined in a field study at the Department of Ophthalmology, Pécs, Hungary. Inclusion criteria consisted of diagnoses of amblyopia, anisometropia, convergent strabismus, and hyperopia. Children with no ophthalmic pathologies were also enrolled as controls. All subjects went through a regular pediatric ophthalmological examination before proceeding to the DRDSE and Lang II tests.

resultsDRDSE and Lang II tests were compared in terms of sensitivity and specificity for different conditions. DRDSE had a 100% sensitivity both for amblyopia (n = 11) and convergent strabismus (n = 21), as well as a 75% sensitivity for hyperopia (n = 36). However, the performance of DRDSE was not statistically significant when screening for anisometropia. On the other hand, Lang II proved to have 81.8% sensitivity for amblyopia, 80.9% for strabismus, and only 52.8% for hyperopia. The specificity of DRDSE was 61.2% for amblyopia, 67.3% for strabismus, and 68.6% for hyperopia, respectively. Conversely, Lang II showed about 10% better specificity, 73.8% for amblyopia, 79.2% for strabismus, and 77.9% for hyperopia.

conclusionsThe DRDSE test has a better sensitivity for the detection of conditions such as amblyopia or convergent strabismus compared with Lang II, although with slightly lower specificity. If the specificity could be further improved by optimization of the stimulus parameters, while keeping the sensitivity high, DRDSE would be a promising stereo vision test for screening of amblyopia.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsVision, BinocularVision DisordersVision ScreeningVisual AcuityAmblyopiaBinocular visionDynamic random dot stereotestLang IIVision screening

Identifiers

PMID30284041
OpenAlexW2895684418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.