Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30284022›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019

A novel liver retraction method in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Yuki Ushimaru, Takeshi Omori, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara, Yuji Shishido, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Keijirou Sugimura, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Jeong-Ho Moon, Hiroshi Miyata, Masayuki Ohue and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparative insights into perioperative performance and three-year survival outcomes.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advancements in liver retraction techniques for laparoscopic gastrectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuki UshimaruDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Takeshi OmoriDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan. oomori-ta@mc.pref.osaka.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5495-6516
Yoshiyuki FujiwaraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Yuji ShishidoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Yoshitomo YanagimotoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Keijirou SugimuraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Kazuyoshi YamamotoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Jeong-Ho MoonDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Hiroshi MiyataDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Masayuki OhueDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Masahiko YanoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Ohtemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
Osaka International Cancer Institute · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetracting the lateral liver segment during laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is important for achieving an optimal surgical field. However, excessive force may injure the liver, causing temporary abnormalities of liver function tests after laparoscopic surgery. We developed a new liver retraction method and assessed its safety and utility. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed records in our surgical database of consecutive surgical patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. We divided the 229 patients into two groups based on the liver retraction method used, either flexible liver retraction with clipping and suturing (FLICS) or the Nathanson retractor (NR). One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to match patients, resulting in the records of 53 pairs of cases extracted from the database. Operative and postoperative outcomes were assessed, including following the values of serum liver enzymes, total bilirubin, and C-reactive protein until postoperative day 30.

resultsThere were no significant differences in patient characteristics or preoperative data in the two groups. The retraction method was not changed intraoperatively for any patients. The operative time was significantly shorter in the FLICS group, but the amount of bleeding did not differ. Liver injury was not observed as a result of liver retraction during surgery. In both groups, serum liver enzymes temporarily increased after surgery but improved rapidly thereafter. The postoperative increases in aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower in the FLICS than in the NR group. No serious complications associated with liver retraction were observed in either group.

conclusionsOur new liver retraction technique provided an optimal surgical field without inducing liver dysfunction. It is a simple, safe, and effective liver retraction technique.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGastrectomyHepatic InsufficiencyHumansLaparoscopyLiver Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsGastric cancerInternal organ retractorLaparoscopic gastrectomyLiver retractionNathanson’s retractorPropensity score-matched analysis

Identifiers

PMID30284022
OpenAlexW2894720564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.