Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30284017›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2019

The perfusion index is a useful screening tool for peripheral artery disease.

Hiroshi Okada, Muhei Tanaka, Takashi Yasuda, Tadaaki Kamitani, Hisahiro Norikae, Tetsuya Fujita, Takashi Nishi, Hirokazu Oyamada, Tetsuro Yamane, Michiaki Fukui

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi OkadaDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, 5-55 Sotojima-cho, Moriguchi, 570-8540, Japan. conti@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
Muhei TanakaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyotamba Hospital, Kyotamba, Japan.
Takashi YasudaDepartment of Nephrology, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Tadaaki KamitaniDepartment of Cardiology, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Hisahiro NorikaeDepartment of General Affairs, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Tetsuya FujitaDepartment of General Affairs, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Takashi NishiDepartment of General Affairs, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Hirokazu OyamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Tetsuro YamaneDepartment of Surgery, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Michiaki FukuiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Matsushita Memorial Hospital · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPTaoka Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of people with peripheral artery disease (PAD) has been increasing globally; therefore, it is important to explore more options to screen patients who are at a risk of developing PAD. The perfusion index (PI) represents the degree of circulation through the peripheral tissues and is measured noninvasively. We investigated the correlation between the PI and ankle-brachial index (ABI) to explore whether the PI could be used a screening tool for PAD. This cross-sectional study included 390 patients. We measured the ABI and PI for all patients. The median ABI value was 1.06 (0.92-1.13); the PI was 1.7% (0.9-3.5). The PI was higher in men than in women (P < 0.0001). The PI was positively correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate and ABI in both men and women. The sensitivity and specificity of the PI to predict PAD (ABI ≤0.9) were 90.0% and 80.3%, respectively, and the cutoff PI value was 1.5% in men. The sensitivity and specificity of the PI to predict PAD were 82.1% and 79.2%, respectively, and the cutoff PI value was 1.1% in women. PI could be a reliable screening tool for diagnosing PAD because it does not restrict the patient's mobility, can be completed in a short time period, and is associated with reduced costs.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnkle Brachial IndexBlood Flow VelocityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMorbidityPeripheral Arterial DiseasePredictive Value of TestsPulsatile FlowAtherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseasesPeripheral artery disease

Identifiers

PMID30284017
OpenAlexW2895395746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.