Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30283918›Full record

ArticleACI2017, improving relations : Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction : proceedings : 21-23 November 2017, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom. International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (4th : 2017 : Milt...2017

Utilising dog-computer interactions to provide mental stimulation in dogs especially during ageing.

Lisa J Wallis, Friederike Range, Enikő Kubinyi, Durga Chapagain, Jessica Serra, Ludwig Huber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACI2017, improving relations : Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction : proceedings : 21-23 November 2017, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom. International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (4th : 2017 : Milt..., 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Considerations for the Retirement of Therapy Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa J WallisClever Dog Lab, Messerli Research Institution, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Friederike RangeClever Dog Lab, Messerli Research Institution, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Enikő KubinyiSenior Family Dog Project, Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Durga ChapagainClever Dog Lab, Messerli Research Institution, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Jessica SerraRoyal Canin Research Centre, Aimargues, France.
Ludwig HuberClever Dog Lab, Messerli Research Institution, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

European Research Council 680040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aged dogs suffer from reduced mobility and activity levels, which can affect their daily lives. It is quite typical for owners of older dogs to reduce all activities such as walking, playing and training, since their dog may appear to no longer need them. Previous studies have shown that ageing can be slowed by mental and physical stimulation, and thus stopping these activities might actually lead to faster ageing in dogs, which can result in a reduction in the quality of life of the animal, and may even decrease the strength of the dog-owner bond. In this paper, we describe in detail a touchscreen apparatus, software and training method that we have used to facilitate dog computer interaction (DCI). We propose that DCI has the potential to improve the welfare of older dogs in particular through cognitive enrichment. We provide hypotheses for future studies to examine the possible effects of touchscreen use on physiological, behavioural and cognitive measures of dogs' positive affect and well-being, and any impact on the dog-owner bond. In the future, collaborations between researchers in animal-computer interaction, dog trainers, and cognitive scientists are essential to develop the hardware and software necessary to realise the full potential of this training and enrichment tool.

Indexed as

Animal welfareDog computer interactionDogsH.5.m. Information interfaces and presentation (ACI)LearningMiscellaneousMotivationSeniorTouchscreen

Identifiers

PMID30283918
PMCPMC6166787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.