ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2018
Algorithm for the multidisciplinary management of hemorrhage in EUS-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collections.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early versus late direct endoscopic necrosectomy for pancreatic walled-off necrosis: a grade‑assessed systematic review with trial sequential evidence.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Guidelines for endoscopic treatment of postinflammatory pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections. Recommendations of the Endoscopic Surgery Section of the Association of Polish Surgeons, the Endoscopy Section of the Polish Society of Gastroenterology, the Polish Pancreatic Club, the Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery Section of the Association of Polish Surgeons, and the Pancreatic Surgery Section of the Association of Polish Surgeons; formulated by an expert panel led by Prof. Mateusz Jagielski, MD, PhD.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Review
- Endoscopic management of active arterial bleeding in walled-off necrosis collection.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Article
- The risk factors of bleeding after EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a single-center experience in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Vascular complications of chronic pancreatitis and its management.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
- The Use of PuraStatMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Endoscopic transluminal drainage and necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Progress and challenges.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- [Conservative or surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis?]Der Internist · 2021Review
- Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Versus Percutaneous Drainage for the Recurrent Pancreatic Fluid Collections.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019Article
- Endoscopic Management of Giant Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis With a High Risk of Bleeding.ACG case reports journal · 2019Article
- Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what's new in 2020?Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), common sequelae of acute or chronic pancreatitis, are broadly classified as pancreatic pseudocysts or walled-off necrosis according to the revised Atlanta classification. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is often considered a standard first-line therapy preferable to surgical or interventional radiology approaches for patients with symptomatic PFC. EUS-guided drainage is effective and successful; it has a technical success rate of 90%-100% and a clinical success rate of 85%-98%. Recent studies have shown a 5%-30% adverse events (AEs) rate for the procedure. The most common AEs include infection, hemorrhage, perforation and stent migration. Hemorrhage, a severe and sometimes deadly outcome, requires a well-organized and appropriate treatment strategy. However, few studies have reported the integrated management of hemorrhage during EUS-guided drainage of PFC. Establishing a practical therapeutic strategy is an essential and significant step in standardized management. The aim of this review is to describe the current situation of EUS-guided drainage of PFCs, including the etiology and treatment of procedure-related bleeding as well as current problems and future perspectives. We propose a novel and meaningful algorithm for systematically managing hemorrhage events. To our limited knowledge, a multidisciplinary algorithm for managing EUS-guided drainage for PFC-related bleeding has not been previously reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.