Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30283645›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2017

No evidence for maintenance of a sympatric

John W Davey, Sarah L Barker, Pasi M Rastas, Ana Pinharanda, Simon H Martin, Richard Durbin, W Owen McMillan, Richard M Merrill, Chris D Jiggins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Association mapping of colour variation in a butterfly provides evidence that a supergene locks together a cluster of adaptive loci.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John W DaveyDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EJ United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1017-9775
Sarah L BarkerDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EJ United Kingdom.
Pasi M RastasDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EJ United Kingdom.
Ana PinharandaDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EJ United Kingdom.
Simon H MartinDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EJ United Kingdom.
Richard DurbinWellcome Trust Sanger Institute Cambridge CB10 1SA United Kingdom.
W Owen McMillanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute Gamboa Panama.
Richard M MerrillDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EJ United Kingdom.
Chris D JigginsDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge CB2 3EJ United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms that suppress recombination are known to help maintain species barriers by preventing the breakup of coadapted gene combinations. The sympatric butterfly species

Indexed as

Chromosomal evolutionevolutionary genomicsinsectsspeciation

Identifiers

PMID30283645
PMCPMC6122123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.