ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2018
Capsule endoscopy: Current status and role in Crohn's disease.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- From Data to Insights: How Is AI Revolutionizing Small-Bowel Endoscopy?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- 18F-FDG-PET and other imaging modalities in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Evaluating clinical diversity and plausibility of synthetic capsule endoscopic images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Is the APEX Score the Pinnacle of Predictive Scoring Systems of Disease Flare in Crohn's Patients with Documented Mucosal Healing?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence to improve polyp detection and screening time in colon capsule endoscopy.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn's Disease-From a Relative Contraindication to Habitual Monitoring Tool.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The role of small-bowel endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: an updated review on the state-of-the-art in 2021.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capsule endoscopy (CE) has proved to be an important non-invasive tool for diagnosis and monitoring Crohn's disease patients. It has the advantage of excellent visualization of digestive tract mucosa, a good tolerability and safety in well-selected patients. The risk of retention can be diminished by good selection of patients using imaging techniques and by the use of patency capsule. The aim of a capsule examination is not only an early diagnosis but also a very good stratification of prognosis, thus directing the treatment strategy for either a step up or top-down approach and also permitting the optimization of the treatment depending on the findings. When symptoms and biomarkers point to a change in the disease's activity we can either adjust the treatment directly as recommended in CALM study or choose in selected patients to visualize the digestive mucosa through a CE and take a decision afterwards. The appearance of the new capsule from Medtronic-the Pillcam Crohn's might be an important step forward in diagnosis, evaluating disease extent, the severity of the disease, prognosis, management in a treat to target approach, with treatment modifications according to the data from CE examination. Serial examinations in the same patient can be compared and a more objective evaluation of the lesions modification from one exam to another can be performed. We present the latest developments and current status and evidence that in selected patients capsule can be a tool in a treat to target approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.