Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30283344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018

Impact of Intrauterine Growth Restriction on Cognitive and Motor Development at 2 Years of Age.

Julia Hartkopf, Franziska Schleger, Jana Keune, Cornelia Wiechers, Jan Pauluschke-Froehlich, Magdalene Weiss, Annette Conzelmann, Sara Brucker, Hubert Preissl, Isabelle Kiefer-Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Recent research on the influence of intrauterine growth restriction on the structure and function of the nervous system.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julia HartkopfInstitute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Franziska SchlegerInstitute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Jana KeuneDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany.
Cornelia WiechersDepartment of Neonatology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Jan Pauluschke-FroehlichDepartment of Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Magdalene WeissfMEG Center, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Annette ConzelmannDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Sara BruckerDepartment of Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Hubert PreisslInstitute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Isabelle Kiefer-SchmidtfMEG Center, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEDeutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. · DEBayreuth Medical Center · DEGerman Center for Diabetes Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), which is already known to be a risk factor for pathological intrauterine development, perinatal mortality, and morbidity, is now also assumed to cause both physical and cognitive alterations in later child development. In the current study, effects of IUGR on infantile brain function were investigated during the fetal period and in a follow-up developmental assessment during early childhood. During the fetal period, visual and auditory event-related responses (VER and AER) were recorded using fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG). VER latencies were analyzed in 73 fetuses (14 IUGR fetuses) while AER latencies were analyzed in 66 fetuses (11 IUGR fetuses). Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second Edition (BSID-II) were used to assess the developmental status of the infants at the age of 24 months. The Mental Development Index (MDI) was available from 66 children (8 IUGR fetuses) and the Psychomotor Development Index (PDI) from 63 children (7 IUGR fetuses). Latencies to visual stimulation were more delayed in IUGR than in small for gestational age (SGA) or appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses, albeit not to any significant extent (

Indexed as

auditory event-related responses (AER)child developmentfetal magnetoencephalographyintrauterine growth restrictionvisual event-related responses (VER)

Identifiers

PMID30283344
PMCPMC6156264
OpenAlexW2890976014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.