Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30283341›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018

Electrical Spinal Stimulation, and Imagining of Lower Limb Movements to Modulate Brain-Spinal Connectomes That Control Locomotor-Like Behavior.

Yury Gerasimenko, Dimitry Sayenko, Parag Gad, Justin Kozesnik, Tatiana Moshonkina, Aleksandr Grishin, Aleksandr Pukhov, Sergey Moiseev, Ruslan Gorodnichev, Victor Selionov and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04807764 (Priming With High-Frequency Trans-spinal Stimulation to Augment Locomotor Benefits in Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04807764 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Priming With High-Frequency Trans-spinal Stimulation to Augment Locomotor Benefits in Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorCity University of New YorkRan2021 to 2024Enrolled14ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Paraplegia, Spinal, Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis, Paraplegia, SpasticArmsStanding transspinal stimulation followed by robotic gait training, Lying transspinal stimulation followed by robotic gait training, Standing sham transspinal stimulation followed by robotic gait training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Neurochemical atlas of the cat spinal cord.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Yury GerasimenkoPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Dimitry SayenkoDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Parag GadDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Justin KozesnikDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Tatiana MoshonkinaPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Aleksandr GrishinPavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Aleksandr PukhovVelikie Luki State Academy of Physical Education and Sport, Velikiye Luki, Russia.
Sergey MoiseevVelikie Luki State Academy of Physical Education and Sport, Velikiye Luki, Russia.
Ruslan GorodnichevVelikie Luki State Academy of Physical Education and Sport, Velikiye Luki, Russia.
Victor SelionovInstitute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Inessa KozlovskayaRussian Federation State Scientific Center, Institute for Bio-Medical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
V Reggie EdgertonDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
University of California, Los Angeles · USVelikie Luki State Academy of Physical Culture and Sports · RUPavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUHouston Methodist · USInstitute for Information Transmission Problems · RUInstitute of Biomedical Problems · RUKazan Federal University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal control of stepping movement in healthy human is based on integration between brain, spinal neuronal networks, and sensory signals. It is generally recognized that there are continuously occurring adjustments in the physiological states of supraspinal centers during all routines movements. For example, visual as well as all other sources of information regarding the subject's environment. These multimodal inputs to the brain normally play an important role in providing a feedforward source of control. We propose that the brain routinely uses these continuously updated assessments of the environment to provide additional feedforward messages to the spinal networks, which provides a synergistic feedforwardness for the brain and spinal cord. We tested this hypothesis in 8 non-injured individuals placed in gravity neutral position with the lower limbs extended beyond the edge of the table, but supported vertically, to facilitate rhythmic stepping. The experiment was performed while visualizing on the monitor a stick figure mimicking bilateral stepping or being motionless. Non-invasive electrical stimulation was used to neuromodulate a wide range of excitabilities of the lumbosacral spinal segments that would trigger rhythmic stepping movements. We observed that at the same intensity level of transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), the presence or absence of visualizing a stepping-like movement of a stick figure immediately initiated or terminated the tSCS-induced rhythmic stepping motion, respectively. We also demonstrated that during both voluntary and imagined stepping, the motor potentials in leg muscles were facilitated when evoked cortically, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and inhibited when evoked spinally, using tSCS. These data suggest that the ongoing assessment of the environment within the supraspinal centers that play a role in planning a movement can routinely modulate the physiological state of spinal networks that further facilitates a synergistic neuromodulation of the brain and spinal cord in preparing for movements.

Indexed as

brain-spinal connectomeimaginglocomotor circuitryTMStranscutaenous spinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30283341
PMCPMC6157483
OpenAlexW2891555255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.