ArticleScientific reports2018
MR imaging of subaortic and retroesophageal anomalous courses of the left brachiocephalic vein in the fetus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of magnetic resonance imaging in fetal congenital heart disease.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: History, Current Status, and Future Directions.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Utility of fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the fetuses with complete vascular ring.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- The Evolution and Developing Importance of Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Congenital Cardiac Anomalies: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Prenatal diagnosis of anomalous left brachiocephalic vein courses using high-definition flow render mode and spatiotemporal image correlation.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2022Article
- Prenatal Diagnosis and Postnatal Outcomes of Left Brachiocephalic Vein Abnormalities: Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Diagnosis of retrotracheal left brachiocephalic vein with prenatal ultrasound: a case report.Translational pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to report fetal cases of subaortic and retroesophageal anomalous courses of the left brachiocephalic vein (LBCV) evaluated by fetal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A retrospective review of 7282 fetal cardiac MRI from June 2006 to March 2017, nine cases of anomalous courses of the LBCV were correctly diagnosed by fetal cardiac MRI, one case of abnormal subaortic left brachiocephalic vein (ASLBV) missed by fetal MRI was identified postnatally during further imaging of the TOF. The diagnosis was confirmed postnatally by cardiac CT/MRI. An ASLBV was found in 8 cases, a retroesophageal LBCV was found in 2 additional cases with right aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery. 3 of 8 ASLBV cases were with a right aortic arch, 4 ASLBV cases had additional cardiovascular anomalies with one case isolated. 7 of 8 ASLBV and 2 retroesophageal LBCV were correctly diagnosed by fetal cardiac MRI; however fetal cardiac MRI missed 2 cases of associated pulmonary atresia (PA). Prenatal echocardiography (echo) correctly diagnosed five ASLBV and one retroesophageal LBCV as well as associated intracardiac anomalies. Fetal cardiac MRI can be a useful adjunct in the identification of subaortic and retroesophageal anomalous courses of the LBCV prenatally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.