Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30282947›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Gait Symmetry Assessment with a Low Back 3D Accelerometer in Post-Stroke Patients.

Wei Zhang, Matthew Smuck, Catherine Legault, Ma A Ith, Amir Muaremi, Kamiar Aminian

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Insole Pressure Sensors to Assess Post-Stroke Gait.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei ZhangLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. w.zhang@epfl.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-1692-9511
Matthew SmuckWearable Health Lab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA. msmuck@stanford.edu.
Catherine LegaultStanford Stroke Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. clegault@stanford.edu.
Ma A IthWearable Health Lab, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA. mith@stanford.edu.
Amir MuaremiNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. amir.muaremi@novartis.com.
Kamiar AminianLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. kamiar.aminian@epfl.ch.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHNovartis (Switzerland) · CHPalo Alto University · USStanford Health Care · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Firmenich n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait asymmetry is an important marker of mobility impairment post stroke. This study proposes a new gait symmetry index (GSI) to quantify gait symmetry with one 3D accelerometer at L3 (GSI

Indexed as

AccelerometryAdultAgedBackFemaleGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalanceStrokeStroke RehabilitationWalkingYoung Adultautocorrelationgait rehabilitationsymmetrytrunk movement

Identifiers

PMID30282947
PMCPMC6209891
OpenAlexW2895226216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.