ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018
An Infrastructure-Free Indoor Localization Algorithm for Smartphones.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Testing and Evaluation Framework for Indoor Navigation and Positioning Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Review of Indoor Localization Methods Leveraging Smartphone Sensors and Spatial Context.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- DeepIOD: Towards A Context-Aware Indoor-Outdoor Detection Framework Using Smartphone Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pedestrian Stride-Length Estimation Based on LSTM and Denoising Autoencoders.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- A Fast Indoor/Outdoor Transition Detection Algorithm Based on Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate indoor positioning technology provides location-based service for a variety of applications. However, most existing indoor localization approaches (e.g., Wi-Fi and Bluetooth-based methods) rely heavily on positioning infrastructure, which prevents their large-scale deployment and limits the range at which they are applicable. Here, we proposed an infrastructure-free indoor positioning and tracking approach, termed LiMag, which used ubiquitous magnetic field and ambient lights (e.g., fluorescent, incandescent, and light-emitting diodes (LEDs)) without containing modulated information. We conducted an in-depth study on both the advantages and the challenges in leveraging magnetic field and ambient light intensity for indoor localization. Based on the insights from this study, we established a hybrid observation model that took full advantage of both the magnetic field and ambient light signals. To address the low discernibility of the hybrid observation model, LiMag first generated a single-step fingerprint model by vectorizing consecutive hybrid observations within each step. In order to accurately track users, a lightweight single-step tracking algorithm based on the single-step fingerprints and the particle filter framework was designed. LiMag leveraged the walking information of users and several single-step fingerprints to generate long trajectory fingerprints that exhibited much higher location differentiation ability than the single-step fingerprint. To accelerate particle convergence and eliminate the accumulative error of single-step tracking algorithm, a long trajectory calibration scheme based on long trajectory fingerprints was also introduced. An undirected weighted graph model was constructed to decrease the computational overhead resulting from this long trajectory matching. In addition to typical indoor scenarios including offices, shopping malls and parking lots, we also conducted experiments in more challenging scenarios, including large open-plan areas as well as environments characterized by strong sunlight. Our proposed algorithm achieved a 75th percentile localization accuracy of 1.8 m and 2.2 m, respectively, in the office and shopping mall tested. In conclusion, our LiMag algorithm provided location-based service of infrastructure-free with significantly improved localization accuracy and coverage, as well as satisfactory robustness inside complex indoor environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.