Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30282742›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Intergroup social influence on emotion processing in the brain.

Lynda C Lin, Yang Qu, Eva H Telzer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Neural connectivity underlying adolescent social learning in sibling dyads.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Seven computations of the social brain.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lynda C LinDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820; llin90@illinois.edu ehtelzer@unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-4182
Yang QuSchool of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Eva H TelzerUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 llin90@illinois.edu ehtelzer@unc.edu.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotions usually occur in a social context; yet little is known about how similar and dissimilar others influence our emotions. In the current study, we examined whether ingroup and outgroup members have differential influence on emotion processing at the behavioral and neural levels. To this end, we recruited 45 participants to rate a series of images displaying people engaged in different emotional contexts. Participants then underwent an fMRI scan where they viewed the same images along with information on how ingroup and outgroup members rated them, and they were asked to rate the images again. We found that participants shifted their emotions to be more in alignment with the ingroup over the outgroup, and that neural regions implicated in positive valuation [ventral striatum (VS) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)], mentalizing [dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), and temporal pole], as well as emotion processing and salience detection (amygdala and insula), linearly tracked this behavior such that the extent of neural activity in these regions paralleled changes in participants' emotions. Results illustrate the powerful impact that ingroup members have on our emotions.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesSocial BehaviorSocial PerceptionAdultBrainBrain MappingEmotionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysPrejudiceTheory of MindYoung Adultemotion processingintergroup social influencesocial neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID30282742
PMCPMC6196546
OpenAlexW2895210792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.