Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30282740›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Intersexual conflict over seed size is stronger in more outcrossed populations of a mixed-mating plant.

Astrid Raunsgard, Øystein H Opedal, Runa K Ekrem, Jonathan Wright, Geir H Bolstad, W Scott Armbruster, Christophe Pélabon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Parental dialectic: Epigenetic conversations in endosperm.Current opinion in plant biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The selfing syndrome and beyond: diverse evolutionary consequences of mating system transitions in plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Postzygotic reproductive isolation established in the endosperm: mechanisms, drivers and relevance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Outbreeders pull harder in a parental tug-of-war.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Astrid RaunsgardCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway; astrid.raunsgard@gmail.com.
Øystein H OpedalCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7841-6933
Runa K EkremCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Jonathan WrightCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5848-4736
Geir H BolstadNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, 7485 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1356-8239
W Scott ArmbrusterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, PO1 2DY Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Christophe PélabonCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8630-8983
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NONorwegian Institute for Nature Research · NOUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In polyandrous species, fathers benefit from attracting greater maternal investment toward their offspring at the expense of the offspring of other males, while mothers should usually allocate resources equally among offspring. This conflict can lead to an evolutionary arms race between the sexes, manifested through antagonistic genes whose expression in offspring depends upon the parent of origin. The arms race may involve an increase in the strength of maternally versus paternally derived alleles engaged in a "tug of war" over maternal provisioning or repeated "recognition-avoidance" coevolution where growth-enhancing paternally derived alleles evolve to escape recognition by maternal genes targeted to suppress their effect. Here, we develop predictions to distinguish between these two mechanisms when considering crosses among populations that have reached different equilibria in this intersexual arms race. We test these predictions using crosses within and among populations of

Indexed as

Gene FlowInheritance PatternsChimeraCrosses, GeneticEuphorbiaceaeGenetic FitnessPlant BreedingSeedsDalechampiainterlocus contest evolutionkinship genomic imprintingparent–offspring conflictsexual conflict

Identifiers

PMID30282740
PMCPMC6233115
OpenAlexW2895722447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.