Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30282683›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2018

Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: a methodological review of workload-injury studies.

Johann Windt, Clare L Ardern, Tim J Gabbett, Karim M Khan, Chad E Cook, Ben C Sporer, Bruno D Zumbo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Anterior cruciate ligament injury incidence in male and female soccer players: A longitudinal study over six consecutive seasons.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Forecasting neuromuscular recovery after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Athlete recovery profiles with generalized additive modeling.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johann WindtExperimental Medicine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5517-2609
Clare L ArdernDivision of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Tim J GabbettGabbett Performance Solutions, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Karim M KhanExperimental Medicine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Chad E CookDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ben C SporerDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Bruno D ZumboMeasurement, Evaluation, and Research Methodology Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo systematically identify and qualitatively review the statistical approaches used in prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported intensive longitudinal data (ILD) (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Since longitudinal research can be improved by aligning the (1) theoretical model, (2) temporal design and (3) statistical approach, we reviewed the statistical approaches used in these studies to evaluate how closely they aligned these three components.

designMethodological review.

methodsAfter finding 6 systematic reviews and 1 consensus statement in our systematic search, we extracted 34 original prospective cohort studies of team sports that reported ILD (>20 observations per athlete) and examined the relationship between athletic workloads and injuries. Using Professor Linda Collins' three-part framework of aligning the theoretical model, temporal design and statistical approach, we qualitatively assessed how well the statistical approaches aligned with the intensive longitudinal nature of the data, and with the underlying theoretical model. Finally, we discussed the implications of each statistical approach and provide recommendations for future research.

resultsStatistical methods such as correlations, t-tests and simple linear/logistic regression were commonly used. However, these methods did not adequately address the (1) themes of theoretical models underlying workloads and injury, nor the (2) temporal design challenges (ILD). Although time-to-event analyses (eg, Cox proportional hazards and frailty models) and multilevel modelling are better-suited for ILD, these were used in fewer than a 10% of the studies (n=3).

conclusionsRapidly accelerating availability of ILD is the norm in many fields of healthcare delivery and thus health research. These data present an opportunity to better address research questions, especially when appropriate statistical analyses are chosen.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic InjuriesHumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, TheoreticalPhysical Conditioning, HumanProspective StudiesResearch DesignRisk FactorsWorkloadathletic injurymethodologystatisticstraining loadworkloads

Identifiers

PMID30282683
PMCPMC6169745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.