Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30282659›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2018

Intracellular RNA-tracking methods.

Logan George, Fred E Indig, Kotb Abdelmohsen, Myriam Gorospe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diverse and abundant phages exploit conjugative plasmids.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. RNA velocity unraveled.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Functional Features and Current Applications of the RNA-Targeting Type VI CRISPR-Cas Systems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Logan GeorgeLaboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Fred E IndigConfocal Core Facility, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Kotb AbdelmohsenLaboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Myriam GorospeLaboratory of Genetics and Genomics, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA myriam-gorospe@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-5439-3434

Funding

Post-transcriptional Regulation Of Proliferative and Stress Response GenesZIAAG000511 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI GOROSPE, MYRIAM · 2009 to 2025
$25.4M
NIA/RRB Confocal Imaging FacilityZICAG000615 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI INDIG, FRED · 2009 to 2025
$17.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA tracking allows researchers to visualize RNA molecules in cells and tissues, providing important spatio-temporal information regarding RNA dynamics and function. Methods such as fluorescent

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceSingle-Cell AnalysisAptamers, NucleotideBacteriophagesCell Line, TumorCRISPR-Associated Protein 9HumansRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedSequence Analysis, RNAAptamers, NucleotideCRISPR-Associated Protein 9RNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedmRNAsnoncoding RNAspost-transcriptional gene regulationribonucleoprotein complexesRNA labelling

Identifiers

PMID30282659
PMCPMC6223214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.