Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30282658›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2018

Roles of glycosaminoglycans as regulators of ligand/receptor complexes.

Robert G Smock, Rob Meijers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Peripheral Nerve Decellularization forACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert G SmockEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany r.smock@embl-hamburg.de.
Rob MeijersEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany r.meijers@embl-hamburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2872-6279
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) play a widespread role in embryonic development, as deletion of enzymes that contribute to GAG synthesis lead to deficiencies in cell migration and tissue modelling. Despite the biochemical and structural characterization of individual protein/GAG interactions, there is no concept available that links the molecular mechanisms of GAG/protein engagements to tissue development. Here, we focus on the role of GAG polymers in mediating interactions between cell surface receptors and their ligands. We categorize several switches that lead to ligand activation, inhibition, selection and addition, based on recent structural studies of select receptor/ligand complexes. Based on these principles, we propose that individual GAG polymers may affect several receptor pathways in parallel, orchestrating a cellular response to an environmental cue. We believe that it is worthwhile to study the role of GAGs as molecular switches, as this may lead to novel drug candidates to target processes such as angiogenesis, neuroregeneration and tumour metastasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsExtracellular MatrixGlycosaminoglycansHedgehog ProteinsHumansLigandsMammalsModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationNetrinsReceptors, Cell SurfaceGlycosaminoglycansHedgehog ProteinsLigandsNetrinsReceptors, Cell Surfacecircuit modifiersdrug targetsextracellular matrixglycosaminoglycansprotein/protein interactions

Identifiers

PMID30282658
PMCPMC6223220
OpenAlexW2895550158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.