ArticleCancer research and treatment2019
Comparison of the 7th and the 8th AJCC Staging System for Non-metastatic D2-Resected Lymph Node-Positive Gastric Cancer Treated with Different Adjuvant Protocols.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of a modified TNM staging system and prediction model based on examined lymph node counts for gastric cancer patients at pathological stage N3.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- An analysis of the relationship of triglyceride glucose index with gastric cancer prognosis: A retrospective study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Development and validation of an inflammatory response-related gene and clinical factor-based signature for predicting prognosis in gastric cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Single patient classifier as a prognostic biomarker in pT1N1 gastric cancer: Results from two large Korean cohorts.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021Article
- Current therapeutic options for gastric adenocarcinoma.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Review
- A Substage Increase in The AJCC Classification System Improves Prognostic Prediction in Stage III Gastric Cancer With Insufficient Lymph Nodes Removed.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Outcomes of Radiotherapy for Mesenchymal and Non-Mesenchymal Subtypes of Gastric Cancer.Cancers · 2020Article
- Comparison between 7th and 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: old problems and new perspectives.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare prognostic differentiation performances of the 7th and the 8th edition of American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for gastric cancer (GC) patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 1,633 GC patients who underwent curative D2 resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy alone (CA) or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) from 2004 to 2013 were included. Concordance index (c-index) was applied to compare the discriminatory ability.
resultsIn the 8th edition, migration of stage was detected in 248 patients (15.2%). Among them, 121 patients were up-staged while 127 patients were down-staged. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the discriminatory ability between the 7th and 8th editions. The new edition of staging system, however, showed a trend of better prognostic performance not only in recurrence-free survival (c-index=0.734; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.706 to 0.762 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.740; 95% CI, 0.712 to 0.768 in the 8th edition; p=0.14), but also in overall survival (c-index=0.717; 95% CI, 0.688 to 0.745 in the 7th edition vs. c-index=0.722; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.751 in the 8th edition; p=0.19), especially in stage III. This finding was repeated in the subgroup analysis regardless of adjuvant CA or CCRT.
conclusionGenerally, the 8th edition of AJCC staging system had failed to show a superior discriminatory ability for curatively D2 resected GC patients than the 7th edition, although there was a trend of better prognostic performance of the new edition, regardless of adjuvant treatment method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.