Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30282446›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2019

Clinical Benefit of Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Showing No Progression after First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin.

Jaewon Hyung, Bumjun Kim, Changhoon Yoo, Kyo-Pyo Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Heung-Moon Chang, Baek-Yeol Ryoo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05222971 (Randomized Open-labeled Phase 2 Study of Maintenance Olaparib With or Without Durvalumab for DDR Gene Mutated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Following Platinum-based Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05222971 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Open-labeled Phase 2 Study of Maintenance Olaparib With or Without Durvalumab for DDR Gene Mutated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Following Platinum-based Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsan Medical CenterRan2022 to 2026Enrolled62ConditionsBiliary Tract Cancer, DNA Damage Repair DeficiencyArmsDurvalumab, Olaparib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cholangiocarcinoma 2026: status quo, unmet needs and priorities.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaewon HyungDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Bumjun KimDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Changhoon YooDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyo-Pyo KimDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Ho JeongDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Heung-Moon ChangDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Baek-Yeol RyooDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Research Foundation of Korea 2016M3A9E8941331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). In ABC-02 study, the BTC patients received up to 6-8 cycles of 3-weekly GemCis; however, those without progression often receive more than 6-8 cycles. The clinical benefit of maintenance treatment in patients without progression is uncertain. MATERIALS AND

methodsAdvanced BTC patients treated with GemCis between April 2010 and February 2015 at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, were retrospectively analysed. The patients without progression after 6-8 cycles were stratified according to further treatment i.e., with or without further cycles of GemCis (maintenance vs. observation groups). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsAmong the 740 BTC patients in the initial screen, 231 cases (31.2%) were eligible for analysis (111 in the observation group, 120 in the maintenance group). The median OS from the GemCis initiation was 20.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.4 to 25.6) and 22.4 months (95% CI, 17.0 to 27.8) in the observation and maintenance groups, respectively (p=0.162). The median PFS was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 13.8) and 13.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.2), respectively (p=0.320).

conclusionsGemCis maintenance is not associated with an improved survival outcome.

Indexed as

AgedBiliary Tract NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCisplatinDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeWatchful WaitingCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineBiliary tract neoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaCisplatinGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID30282446
PMCPMC6639240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.