Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30281810›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2019

One-year change in cognitive flexibility and fine motor function in middle-aged male and female marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Kathryn P Workman, Brianna Healey, Alyssa Carlotto, Agnès Lacreuse

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Scopolamine induced learning deficit in marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Suppressing UBE2N ameliorates Alzheimer's disease pathology through the clearance of amyloid beta.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn P WorkmanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Brianna HealeyNeuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Alyssa CarlottoNeuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Agnès LacreuseDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2890-9649
University of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Sex differences in cognitive and brain aging: a primate modelR01AG046266 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI LACREUSE, AGNES · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is uniquely suited for longitudinal studies of cognitive aging, due to a relatively short lifespan, sophisticated cognitive abilities, and patterns of brain aging that resemble those of humans. We examined cognitive function and fine motor skills in male and female marmosets (mean age ∼5 at study entry) followed longitudinally for 2 years. Each year, monkeys were tested on a reversal learning task with three pairs of stimuli (n = 18, 9 females) and a fine motor task requiring them to grasp small rewards from two staircases (Hill and Valley test, n = 12, 6 females). There was little evidence for a decline in cognitive flexibility between the two time points, in part because of practice effects. However, independent of year of testing, females took longer than males to reach criterion in the reversals, indicating impaired cognitive flexibility. Motivation was unlikely to contribute to this effect, as males refused a greater percentage of trials than females in the reversals. With regards to motor function, females were significantly faster than males in the Hill and Valley task. From Year 1 to Year 2, a slight slowing of motor function was observed in both sexes, but accuracy decreased significantly in males only. This study (1) demonstrates that marmosets exhibit sex differences in cognitive flexibility and fine motor function that resemble those described in humans; (2) that changes in fine motor function can already be detected at middle-age; and (3) that males may experience greater age-related changes in fine motor skills than females. Additional data points will determine whether these sex and age differences persist over time.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsCallithrixCognitionFemaleMaleMotor SkillsReversal LearningSex Factorsagingcognitionexecutive functionmonkeysex differences

Identifiers

PMID30281810
PMCPMC6816503
OpenAlexW2895564148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.