Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30281806›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2019

Deceased Pediatric Donor Livers: How Current Policy Drives Allocation and Transplantation.

Jin Ge, Evelyn K Hsu, John Bucuvalas, Jennifer C Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Split liver transplantation is utilized infrequently and concentrated at few transplant centers in the United States.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jin GeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-1574-1525
Evelyn K HsuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA.
John BucuvalasDepartment of Pediatrics and Recanati-Miller Transplant Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Jennifer C LaiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-2092-6380

Funding

UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
The spectrum of cognitive impairment including Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias after liver transplantationR01AG059183 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Jennifer C. Lai · 2018 to 2026
$9.9M
Frailty and Functional Status in Older Liver Transplant PatientsK23AG048337 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAI, JENNIFER C. · 2014 to 2018
$911k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG048337NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059183NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each year, approximately 60 children, representing 12% of waitlist candidates, die awaiting liver transplantation. The current allocation algorithm for pediatric donor livers prioritizes local/regional adults over national children. We attempted to better understand the impact of the present algorithm on pediatric candidates. We analyzed pediatric donor liver offers from 2010 to 2014. Donors and recipients were classified based on age. We mapped allocation and acceptance patterns and used subgroup analyses to explore the significance of donor service areas (DSAs) with low pediatric transplant volumes. We used Cox proportional hazard regressions to evaluate posttransplantation outcomes: 3,318 pediatric donor livers were transplanted into 3,482 recipients, and 45% (1,569) were adults. Of the 1,569 adults, 25% (390) received a pediatric organ that was never offered to children; 52% (204) of these 390 pediatric organs originated in the 37 DSAs, with ≤25 pediatric liver transplantations; 278 children died or were delisted due to illness during the same time, with higher mortality rates in the 37 DSAs (10% versus 6%, P < 0.01). Compared to adults, pediatric recipients aged <12 years had lower risks of posttransplant mortality (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.81; P < 0.01). Conclusions: We found that 45% of pediatric donor livers were transplanted into adults: 390 adults were transplanted with pediatric organs never offered to children, while 278 children died or were delisted due to illness, which was more apparent in DSAs with low pediatric transplant volumes; we advocate for a change to allocation policies to allow pediatric organs to be offered to national children with status 1B or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease >15 before being offered to local/regional + circle non-status 1A adults.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationPolicyAdolescentCadaverChildEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID30281806
PMCPMC6881175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.