ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2018
Development of a Clinically Feasible Process for Identifying Individual Health Priorities.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05303194 (Patient Priorities Care for Hispanics With Dementia), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patient Priorities Care for Hispanics With Dementia
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed.
- Goal setting among older adults starting mobile health cardiac rehabilitation in the RESILIENT trial.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Trial
- Comparison of Collaborative Goal Setting With Enhanced Education for Managing Diabetes-Associated Distress and Hemoglobin A1c Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Changes over Time in Patient Stated Values and Treatment Preferences Regarding Aggressive Therapies: Insights from the DECIDE-LVAD Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022Trial
- Effect of Telephone-Delivered Collaborative Goal Setting and Behavioral Activation vs Enhanced Usual Care for Depression Among Adults With Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2019Trial
- Strategies to Promote Resilience and Community Reintegration for Patients With New Disabilities After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Study Integrating Patient and Family Perspectives.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2026Article
- Integrating 'what matters' conversations into preoperative care: a qualitative evaluation of surgical team workflows and barriers.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- An Age-Friendly Approach to Caring for Chronic Lung Disease in the Ambulatory Setting.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Review
- Empowering Older Adults Through Values-Informed Solutions for Technology Adoption: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Identifying Implementation Needs and Developing Strategies to Optimize Integration of Patient Priorities Care in Primary Care: A Qualitative Formative Evaluation of Two Study Sites.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Perceived Connections Between Personal Values and Health in High-Risk Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Unique Challenges of Shared Decision-Making in Colorectal Surgery for the Elderly Patient.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Article
- Coronary Artery Revascularization in the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Patient-Centered Prioritization of Health Care Processes for Multimorbidity.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Study of Health Priorities of People With Dementia and Care Partners in Emergency Department and Hospital Care in a Public Safety-Net Setting.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Protocol for a randomized trial of self-management support for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using lay health coaches.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- Aligning Surgical Decisions With Older Adults' Outcome Goals.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Co-occurring Mental and Chronic Health Conditions.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Need for Engagement in Stroke Prevention Shared Decision-Making in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation and Multimorbidity.Advances in geriatric medicine and research · 2025Article
- Older Adults' Experiences of Emergency Department Admission Decisions: A Qualitative Study in a Public Safety Net Hospital.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Understanding the multiple dimensions of ageing: 5Ms for the rheumatologist.The Lancet. Rheumatology · 2024Review
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a values-based, clinically feasible process to help older adults identify health priorities that can guide clinical decision-making.
designProspective development and feasibility study.
settingPrimary care practice in Connecticut.
participantsOlder adults with 3 or more conditions or taking 10 or more medications (N=64).
interventionThe development team of patients, caregivers, and clinicians used a user-centered design framework-ideate → prototype → test →redesign-to develop and refine the value-based patient priorities care process and medical record template with trained clinician facilitators. MEASUREMENTS: We used descriptive statistics of quantitative measures (percentage accepted invitation and completed template, duration of process) and qualitative analysis of barriers and enablers (challenges and solutions identified, facilitator perceptions).
resultsWe developed and refined a process for identifying patient health priorities that was typically completed in 35 to 45 minutes over 2 sessions; 64 patients completed the process. Qualitative analyses were used to elucidate the characteristics and training needed for the patient priorities facilitators, as well as perceived benefits and challenges of the process. Refinements based on our experience and feedback include streamlining the process for greater feasibility, balancing fidelity to the process while customizing to individuals, encouraging patients to share their priorities with their clinicians, and simplifying the template transmitted to clinicians.
conclusionTrained facilitators conducted this process in a busy primary care practice, suggesting that patient priorities identification is feasible and acceptable, although testing in additional settings is necessary. We hope to show that clinicians can align care with patients' health priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.