Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30281779›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of dermatology2019

Long-term clinical safety of clindamycin and rifampicin combination for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. A Critically Appraised Topic.

J Albrecht, P A Baine, B Ladizinski, G B Jemec, M Bigby

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Tetracyclines-An Important Therapeutic Tool for Dermatologists.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. [Hidradenitis suppurativa /acne inversa-surgical options, reconstruction and combinations with drug therapies-an update].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hidradenitis suppurativa.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

J AlbrechtDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, J.H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, 1900 West Polk Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-5998-7773
P A BaineCountway Library of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, U.S.A.
B LadizinskiDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, J.H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, 1900 West Polk Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, U.S.A.
G B JemecDepartment of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-2540
M BigbyDepartment of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, U.S.A.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBoston Public Library · USJohn H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County · USRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical question/scenarioCan therapy with clindamycin and rifampicin be safely continued long term beyond the recommended 10-week course?

backgroundClindamycin and rifampicin are used in combination to treat hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). There is no data on the efficacy and safety of clindamycin/rifampicin combination therapy for HS beyond 10 weeks.

methodsWe identified the following major concerns that still lack a proper evidenced-based analysis: for rifampicin, drug-induced liver injury, interstitial nephritis, drug interaction and hepatic p450 3A4 enzyme induction; for clindamycin, the concern was community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (CA-CDI); and experience with long-term treatment. Data sources were used as appropriate to answer the question. Systematic searches were used to assess the risk of CA-CDI and experience with long-term treatment with clindamycin. RESULTS/IDENTIFIED EVIDENCE: The risk for rifampicin-induced liver injury is highest in the first 6 weeks of treatment, whereas interstitial nephritis is primarily observed during intermittent treatment. Enzyme induction due to rifampicin is usually complete after about 2 weeks of treatment and reduces clindamycin blood levels by about 90%. Three meta-analyses identified antibiotic use as a risk factor for CA-CDI. Two of them assigned the highest risk to clindamycin. None of them stratified by length of treatment. There is extensive experience with rifampicin, primarily for the treatment of tuberculosis. Long-term experience with clindamycin is limited. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION FOR CLINICAL CARE: The analysed risks associated with a combination of clindamycin and rifampicin for hidradenitis suppurative cluster within the first 10 weeks. Treatment can be continued beyond 10 weeks, if clinically necessary.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryClindamycinCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InducersDrug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousHidradenitis SuppurativaHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicNephritis, InterstitialRifampinRisk AssessmentSystematic Reviews as TopicTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InducersRifampin

Identifiers

PMID30281779
OpenAlexW2895592149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.