ArticlePloS one2018
Structure and development of flowers and inflorescences in Peraceae and Euphorbiaceae and the evolution of pseudanthia in Malpighiales.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pseudanthia in angiosperms: a review.Annals of botany · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudanthia are reduced and compact inflorescences which apparently had independent evolution in Euphorbiaceae and Peraceae within Malpighiales. In order to analyze the hypothesis that the different pseudanthia found in Malpighiales have non-homologous developmental steps, we studied the inflorescence and flower development in the three Malpighiales genera that present this type of inflorescence-Dalechampia (Acalyphoideae/Euphorbiaceae), Euphorbia (Euphorbioideae/Euphorbiaceae), and Pera (Peraceae)-and compared them to that of Joannesia (Crotonoideae/Euphorbiaceae), which does not present a pseudanthium. Inflorescences and flowers were analyzed using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Dalechampia and Euphorbia have protogynic bisexual pseudanthia, with unisexual perianthed flowers in Dalechampia, and achlamydeous flowers in Euphorbia. Pera has unisexual pseudanthia and the male flowers have a vestigial calyx and the female flowers are achlamydeous. Joannesia flowers are very distinct when compared to the pseudanthia flowers, as they are composed of all the whorls and there is no reduction. In the early stages of development, the first structures to be formed in the pseudanthia are the different series of bracts, including outer, involucral and involucel bracts. The floral primordia are initiated almost simultaneously with the involucre. Although the different morphology, the early inflorescence followed the same branching pattern in all studied genera, and the number and elongation of the branches were affected by the early female flower development in the terminal position. We suggest that the different pseudanthia evolved via process of floral whorl reduction and reorganization of flowers in the inflorescence axes, especially the position of female and male flowers and elongation or shortening of the branches. The sex of the terminal flower is a developmental key, i.e., the protogynic development deeply affects the pseudanthia growth, reducing the ramification and elongation of the axes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.