Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30281664›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Structural characterization of four different naturally occurring porcine collagen membranes suitable for medical applications.

Thimo Maurer, Michael H Stoffel, Yury Belyaev, Niklaus G Stiefel, Beatriz Vidondo, Susanne Küker, Helga Mogel, Birgit Schäfer, Jasmin Balmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nanoneedle-Based Materials for Intracellular Studies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thimo MaurerDivision of Veterinary Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael H StoffelDivision of Veterinary Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Yury BelyaevDivision of Veterinary Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Niklaus G StiefelGeistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5884-1553
Beatriz VidondoVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Susanne KükerVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Helga MogelDivision of Veterinary Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Birgit SchäferGeistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland.
Jasmin BalmerDivision of Veterinary Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3411-8408
University of Bern · CHGeistlich Pharma (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collagen is the main structural element of connective tissues, and its favorable properties make it an ideal biomaterial for regenerative medicine. In dental medicine, collagen barrier membranes fabricated from naturally occurring tissues are used for guided bone regeneration. Since the morphological characteristics of collagen membranes play a crucial role in their mechanical properties and affect the cellular behavior at the defect site, in-depth knowledge of the structure is key. As a base for the development of novel collagen membranes, an extensive morphological analysis of four porcine membranes, including centrum tendineum, pericardium, plica venae cavae and small intestinal submucosa, was performed. Native membranes were analyzed in terms of their thickness. Second harmonic generation and two-photon excitation microscopy of the native membranes showed the 3D architecture of the collagen and elastic fibers, as well as a volumetric index of these two membrane components. The surface morphology, fiber arrangement, collagen fibril diameter and D-periodicity of decellularized membranes were investigated by scanning electron microscopy. All the membrane types showed significant differences in thickness. In general, undulating collagen fibers were arranged in stacked layers, which were parallel to the membrane surface. Multiphoton microscopy revealed a conspicuous superficial elastic fiber network, while the elastin content in deeper layers varied. The elastin/collagen volumetric index was very similar in the investigated membranes and indicated that the collagen content was clearly higher than the elastin content. The surface of both the pericardium and plica venae cavae and the cranial surface of the centrum tendineum revealed a smooth, tightly arranged and crumpled morphology. On the caudal face of the centrum tendineum, a compact collagen arrangement was interrupted by clusters of circular discontinuities. In contrast, both surfaces of the small intestinal submucosa were fibrous, fuzzy and irregular. All the membranes consisted of largely uniform fibrils displaying the characteristic D-banding. This study reveals similarities and relevant differences among the investigated porcine membranes, suggesting that each membrane represents a unique biomaterial suitable for specific applications.

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialSwineAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenElastinOptical ImagingBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenElastinMembranes, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID30281664
PMCPMC6169977
OpenAlexW2895104681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.