ArticlePloS one2018
What you saw is what you will hear: Two new illusions with audiovisual postdictive effects.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Did you see the sound? A Bayesian assessment on cross-modal perception in low vision.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Sequential neural dynamics underlie unconscious integration and conscious perception of visual stimuli.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Consciously detecting and recognizing a past visual word after its sensory trace is gone.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Causal inference shapes crossmodal postdiction in multisensory integration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bayesian Causal Inference Accounts for Multisensory Filling-In at the Blind Spot.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Individual alpha frequency tACS modifies the detection of space-time optical illusion.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- The magnitude of the sound-induced flash illusion does not increase monotonically as a function of visual stimulus eccentricity.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Crossmodal Postdiction: Conscious Perception as Revisionist History.Journal of perceptual imaging · 2022Article
- Neural representations of own-voice in the human auditory cortex.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Correction: What you saw is what you will hear: Two new illusions with audiovisual postdictive effects.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroscience investigations are most often focused on the prediction of future perception or decisions based on prior brain states or stimulus presentations. However, the brain can also process information retroactively, such that later stimuli impact conscious percepts of the stimuli that have already occurred (called "postdiction"). Postdictive effects have thus far been mostly unimodal (such as apparent motion), and the models for postdiction have accordingly been limited to early sensory regions of one modality. We have discovered two related multimodal illusions in which audition instigates postdictive changes in visual perception. In the first illusion (called the "Illusory Audiovisual Rabbit"), the location of an illusory flash is influenced by an auditory beep-flash pair that follows the perceived illusory flash. In the second illusion (called the "Invisible Audiovisual Rabbit"), a beep-flash pair following a real flash suppresses the perception of the earlier flash. Thus, we showed experimentally that these two effects are influenced significantly by postdiction. The audiovisual rabbit illusions indicate that postdiction can bridge the senses, uncovering a relatively-neglected yet critical type of neural processing underlying perceptual awareness. Furthermore, these two new illusions broaden the Double Flash Illusion, in which a single real flash is doubled by two sounds. Whereas the double flash indicated that audition can create an illusory flash, these rabbit illusions expand audition's influence on vision to the suppression of a real flash and the relocation of an illusory flash. These new additions to auditory-visual interactions indicate a spatio-temporally fine-tuned coupling of the senses to generate perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.