Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30281615›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Efficacy and safety of 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A meta-analysis.

Jae Heon Kim, Min Jung Baek, Hwa Yeon Sun, Bora Lee, Shufeng Li, Yash Khandwala, Francesco Del Giudice, Benjamin I Chung

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Global online interest in finasteride sexual side effects.International journal of impotence research · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Novel Low-Cost Uroflowmetry for Patient Telemonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Current Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jae Heon KimDepartment of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4490-3610
Min Jung BaekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea.
Hwa Yeon SunDepartment of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchuhyang University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.
Bora LeeDepartment of Statistics, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Shufeng LiDepartment of Urology and Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Yash KhandwalaDepartment of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Urology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3865-5988
Benjamin I ChungDepartment of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KRStanford Medicine · USCHA University Bundang Medical Center · KRChung-Ang University · KRSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN ACADEMIC NEPHROLOGYT32DK007357 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERTOW, GLENN MATTHEW · 1986 to 2022
$4.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough combination therapy with 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) and alpha-blocker is one of the standard interventions in symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 5ARI monotherapy is seldom the focus of attention. Adverse events associated with 5ARI include depression and suicidal attempts in addition to persistent erectile dysfunction. The aim of this study is to update our knowledge of clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse events associated with 5ARI treatment in symptomatic BPH. METHODS AND

findingsA meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) from 1966 until March, 2017 was performed using database from PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration and Embase. A total of 23395 patients were included in this study and the inclusion criteria were: RCTs with 5ARI and placebo in symptomatic BPH patients. Parameters included prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume (PV), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPPS), post-void residual urine (PVR), voiding symptoms of IPSS (voiding IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and adverse events (AEs). A meta-analysis with meta-regression was performed for each effect size and adverse events, sensitivity analysis, cumulative analysis along with the analysis of ratio of means (ROM) in the placebo group. A total of 42 studies were included in this study for review, and a total of 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis, including a total of 23395 patients (treatment group: 11392, placebo group: 12003). The effect size of all variables except PVR showed a significant improvement following 5ARI treatment compared with placebo. However, the effect size of differences showed declining trend in PV, IPSS and Qmax according to recent years of publication. In ROM analysis, PV showed no significant increase in the placebo group, with a ROM of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.88, 1.14). The 5ARI treatment resulted in a significantly higher incidence of decreased libido (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.36, 2.13), ejaculatory disorder (OR = 2.94; 95% CI, 2.15, 4.03), gynecomastia (OR = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.41, 3.83), and impotence (OR = 1.74; 95% CI, 1.32, 2.29). Our study has the following limitations: included studies were heterogeneous and direct comparison of efficacy between alpha blocker and 5ARI was not performed. Adverse events including depression or suicidal attempt could not be analyzed in this meta-analysis setting.

conclusionsAlthough there was a significant clinical benefit of 5ARI monotherapy compared with placebo, the effective size was small. Moreover, the risk of adverse events including sexually related complications were high. Additional head-to-head studies are needed to re-evaluate the clinical efficacy of 5ARI compared with alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers.

Indexed as

5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsAgedDrug Therapy, CombinationErectile DysfunctionHumansLibidoMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic Hyperplasia5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAdrenergic alpha-AntagonistsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID30281615
PMCPMC6169865
OpenAlexW2895506751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.