Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30281604›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Oral cholera vaccine coverage during a preventive door-to-door mass vaccination campaign in Nampula, Mozambique.

Cynthia Semá Baltazar, Florentina Rafael, José Paulo M Langa, Sergio Chicumbe, Philippe Cavailler, Bradford D Gessner, Lorenzo Pezzoli, Américo Barata, Dores Zaina, Dortéia L Inguane and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cynthia Semá BaltazarInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Florentina RafaelAgence de Médecine Préventive, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-549X
José Paulo M LangaInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sergio ChicumbeInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Philippe CavaillerAgence de Médecine Préventive, Ferney-Voltaire, France.
Bradford D GessnerAgence de Médecine Préventive, Paris, France.
Lorenzo PezzoliWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Américo BarataDirecção Provincial de Saúde, Ministry of Health, Nampula, Mozambique.
Dores ZainaDirecção de Saúde de Cidade, Ministry of Health, Nampula, Mozambique.
Dortéia L InguaneInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.
Martin A MengelAgence de Médecine Préventive, Paris, France.
Aline MunierAgence de Médecine Préventive, Paris, France.
Agence de Médecine Préventive · FRInstituto Nacional de Saúde · MZMinistry of Health · MZWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn addition to improving water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) measures and optimal case management, the introduction of Oral cholera vaccine (OCV) is a complementary strategy for cholera prevention and control for vulnerable population groups. In October 2016, the Mozambique Ministry of Health implemented a mass vaccination campaign using a two-dose regimen of the Shanchol™ OCV in six high-risk neighborhoods of Nampula city, in Northern Mozambique. Overall 193,403 people were targeted by the campaign, which used a door-to-door strategy. During campaign follow-up, a population survey was conducted to assess: (1) OCV coverage; (2) frequency of adverse events following immunization; (3) vaccine acceptability and (4) reasons for non-vaccination. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn the absence of a household listing and clear administrative neighborhood delimitations, we used geospatial technology to select households from satellite images and used the support of community leaders. One person per household was randomly selected for interview. In total, 636 individuals were enrolled in the survey. The overall vaccination coverage with at least one dose (including card and oral reporting) was 69.5% (95%CI: 51.2-88.2) and the two-dose coverage was 51.2% (95%CI: 37.9-64.3). The campaign was well accepted. Among the 185 non-vaccinated individuals, 83 (44.6%) did not take the vaccine because they were absent when the vaccination team visited their houses. Among the 451 vaccinated individuals, 47 (10%) reported minor and non-specific complaints, and 78 (17.3%) mentioned they did not receive any information before the campaign. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In spite of overall coverage being slightly lower than expected, the use of a mobile door-to-door strategy remains a viable option even in densely-populated urban settings. Our results suggest that campaigns can be successfully implemented and well accepted in Mozambique in non-emergency contexts in order to prevent cholera outbreaks. These findings are encouraging and complement the previous Mozambican experience related to OCV.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCholeraCholera VaccinesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMass VaccinationMozambiqueSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccination CoverageVulnerable PopulationsCholera Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30281604
PMCPMC6169854
OpenAlexW2894691536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.