Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30281413›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of occupational and environmental health

Occupational health and safety in cannabis production: an Australian perspective.

Maggie Davidson, Sue Reed, Jacques Oosthuizen, Greg O'Donnell, Pragna Gaur, Martyn Cross, Gary Dennis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of occupational and environmental health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Emerging Spectrum of Respiratory Diseases in the U.S. Cannabis Industry.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maggie Davidsona School of Science and Health , Western Sydney University , Sydney , Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8426-1843
Sue Reedb School of Medical & Health Sciences , Edith Cowan University , Joondalup , Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1384-5208
Jacques Oosthuizenb School of Medical & Health Sciences , Edith Cowan University , Joondalup , Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1589-5957
Greg O'Donnellc Test Safe Analytical Services , Safe Work NSW , Sydney , Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0276-9721
Pragna Gaurd Illicit Drugs Analysis Unit , Forensics Analytical Science Services , Sydney , Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2921-083X
Martyn Crossb School of Medical & Health Sciences , Edith Cowan University , Joondalup , Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9457-128X
Gary Dennisa School of Science and Health , Western Sydney University , Sydney , Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9476-6028
Edith Cowan University · AUSafe Work Australia · AUServices Australia · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The legal Australian cannabis industry has been rapidly expanding due to increased awareness of the plant's therapeutic potential, as well its diverse range of applications including biofuel, textiles, building materials, food, nutritional supplement, and animal feed. The objective of this paper is to describe the current landscape of the commercial Australian cannabis industry, summarise occupational health and safety (OHS) hazards in cannabis-related working environments, and provide suggestions for safeguarding worker health and well-being in this emerging industry. A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 1900 and 2017 was undertaken to identify case studies and original epidemiological research on OHS hazards associated with the cannabis cultivation and the manufacture of cannabis-based products. The review found that the majority of OHS studies were undertaken in the hemp textile industry during the late twentieth century, with a small number of articles published from a variety of occupational environments including forensic laboratories and recreational marijuana farms. Cannabis harvesting and initial processing is labour intensive, and presents a physical hazard Depending on the operation, workers may also be exposed to a variety of biological, chemical, and physical hazards including: organic dusts, bioaerosols, pollen/allergens, volatile organic compounds, psychoactive substances (tetrahydrocannabinol [THC])), noise, and ultraviolet radiation. Little research has been undertaken on the exposure to inhalable organic dust and other bioaerosols during the commercial cultivation and manufacture of cannabis-based products. Furthermore, there is an absence of Australian-based research and OHS guidance materials to help professionals develop risk management strategies in this evolving industry. It is recommended that: Investigation into the toxicological properties of cannabis dusts, specifically in relation to potential occupational exposures during cultivation and manufacture, should be a priority. The interim adoption of the respirable cotton dust exposure standard of 0.2 mg/m

Indexed as

CannabisOccupational HealthSafety ManagementAerosolsAgricultureAir Pollutants, OccupationalAllergensHumansOccupational ExposurePhytochemicalsVolatile Organic CompoundsAerosolsAir Pollutants, OccupationalAllergensPhytochemicalsVolatile Organic CompoundsCannabisexposurehempmarijuanaoccupational health and safetyoccupational hygiene

Identifiers

PMID30281413
PMCPMC6237171
OpenAlexW2895148717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.