ReviewArchives of pathology & laboratory medicine2018
Atypical Ductal Lesions of the Breast: Criteria, Significance, and Laboratory Updates.
Review in Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Active Monitoring versus Surgical Excision for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Observational
- A Multicentre Observational Study on Risk Factors for Breast Cancer.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
CONTEXT.—: Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a challenging diagnosis defined by cytologic and architectural features that carries an increased risk of subsequent carcinoma when diagnosed in isolation. In addition, ADH may secondarily involve benign breast lesions, wherein it carries variable clinical significance. OBJECTIVES.—: To review the diagnostic criteria and clinical significance of ADH in isolation and as it involves benign breast lesions, and to review the evolving literature on its molecular signature. DATA SOURCES.—: Recently published studies that collectively examine ADH were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS.—: Atypical ductal hyperplasia carries an increased risk of subsequent carcinoma in isolation and when it involves most benign breast lesions. Identifying which cases of ADH will be upgraded to carcinoma has been challenging, and new laboratory developments, such as EZH2 overexpression, may have a future role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.