Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30280509›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2018

Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review.

Maria C De Cola, Francesco Corallo, Deborah Pria, Viviana Lo Buono, Rocco S Calabrò

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06895109 (Evaluation of Improvement in Cognitive Functions and Psychological Aspects in Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury After Cranioplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06895109 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Improvement in Cognitive Functions and Psychological Aspects in Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury After Cranioplasty

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsBrain Injury, Neuropsychological Deficits, Cranioplasty, Cognitive Deficit Following Brain LesionsArmsimprovement of cognitive functions and psychological aspects
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Approach to Cranioorbital Gunshot Wounds.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Craniectomy and Cranioplasty Effects on Balance and Gait in Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria C De ColaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy.
Francesco CoralloIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy.
Deborah PriaIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy.
Viviana Lo BuonoIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy.
Rocco S CalabròIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8566-3166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCranioplasty is a surgical technique applied for the reconstruction of the skullcap removed during decompressive craniectomy (DC). Cranioplasty improves rehabilitation from a motor and cognitive perspective. However, it may increase the possibility of postoperative complications, such as seizures and infections. Timing of cranioplasty is therefore crucial even though literature is controversial. In this study, we compared motor and cognitive effects of early cranioplasty after DC and assess the optimal timing to perform it.

methodsA literature research was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. We selected studies including at least one of the following test: Mini-Mental State Examination, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test immediate and 30-min delayed recall, Digit Span Test, Glasgow Coma Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale, Functional Independence Measure, and Barthel Index.

resultsSix articles and two systematic reviews were included in the present study. Analysis of changes in pre- and postcranioplasty scores showed that an early procedure (within 90 days from decompressive craniectomy) is more effective in improving motor functions (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.51 [0.05; 0.97], p-value = 0.03), whereas an early procedure did not significantly improve neither MMSE score (SMD = 0.06 [-0.49; 0.61], p-value = 0.83) nor memory functions (SMD = -0.63 [-0.97; -0.28], p-value < 0.001). No statistical significance emerged when we compared studies according to the timing from DC.

conclusionsIt is believed that cranioplasty performed from 3 to 6 months after DC may significantly improve both motor and cognitive recovery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCognition DisordersDecompressive CraniectomyFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansMaleMemoryMemory and Learning TestsMental RecallMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPsychomotor DisordersRetrospective Studiescognitive outcomescranioplastymotor recoveryneurorehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID30280509
PMCPMC6236242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.