Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30280371›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2018

Switchable DNA-origami nanostructures that respond to their environment and their applications.

Jasleen Kaur Daljit Singh, Minh Tri Luu, Ali Abbas, Shelley F J Wickham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Magnetic DNA Origami Nanorotors.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Signalling and social learning in swarms of robots.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasleen Kaur Daljit SinghSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.
Minh Tri LuuSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.
Ali AbbasSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.
Shelley F J WickhamSchool of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia. shelley.wickham@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-3546

Funding

Australian Research Council DE180101635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural DNA nanotechnology, in which Watson-Crick base pairing drives the formation of self-assembling nanostructures, has rapidly expanded in complexity and functionality since its inception in 1981. DNA nanostructures can now be made in arbitrary three-dimensional shapes and used to scaffold many other functional molecules such as proteins, metallic nanoparticles, polymers, fluorescent dyes and small molecules. In parallel, the field of dynamic DNA nanotechnology has built DNA circuits, motors and switches. More recently, these two areas have begun to merge-to produce switchable DNA nanostructures, which change state in response to their environment. In this review, we summarise switchable DNA nanostructures into two major classes based on response type: molecular actuation triggered by local chemical changes such as pH or concentration and external actuation driven by light, electric or magnetic fields. While molecular actuation has been well explored, external actuation of DNA nanostructures is a relatively new area that allows for the remote control of nanoscale devices. We discuss recent applications for DNA nanostructures where switching is used to perform specific functions-such as opening a capsule to deliver a molecular payload to a target cell. We then discuss challenges and future directions towards achieving synthetic nanomachines with complexity on the level of the protein machinery in living cells.

Indexed as

ActuationDNA nanotechnologyDNA origamiNanomachinesSwitchable nanostructures

Identifiers

PMID30280371
PMCPMC6233340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.