ReviewDer Orthopade2018
[Biologics and further new drugs for rheumatic diseases since 2000].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis are severe diseases, which without adequate treatment lead to extremely reduced mobility, functional status and quality of life.
objectiveThe effects of biologics and further new antirheumatic drugs on the burden of disease.
methodsEvaluation of study results and register data dealing with the efficacy and safety of these drugs.
resultsBiologics have been proven to dramatically improve the outcome of all three diseases and contributed to the fact that remission is a realistic target today. In addition, the cardiovascular risk and mortality in RA have been reduced and structural damage is considerably blocked by biologics. Recently Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors contributed to the treatment possibilities in the same way. Biologics as well as JAK inhibitors offer an excellent safety profile and tolerability with infections being the most important risk.
conclusionWith the availability of biologics and additional new drugs all three diseases have lost the status of difficult to treat diseases. Their usage according to the guidelines ensures that the burden of disease can been minimalized in most cases. The benefit-risk profile of these drugs has been shown to be excellent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.