Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30280216›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019

Induced membrane technique for the treatment of severe acute tibial bone loss: preliminary experience at medium-term follow-up.

Mario Ronga, Mario Cherubino, Katia Corona, Alessandro Fagetti, Barbara Bertani, Luigi Valdatta, Redento Mora, Paolo Cherubino

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Management of tibial non-unions with Masquelet technique after failed previous treatment options for Grade III open fractures.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mario RongaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences 'Vincenzo Tiberio', University of Molise, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 86100, Campobasso, Italy. mario.ronga@unimol.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6256-3621
Mario CherubinoPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences (DBSV), University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Katia CoronaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences 'Vincenzo Tiberio', University of Molise, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 86100, Campobasso, Italy.
Alessandro FagettiOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences (DBSV), University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Barbara BertaniDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Luigi ValdattaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences (DBSV), University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Redento MoraDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Paolo CherubinoOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences (DBSV), University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeManagement of acute open tibial fractures with critical bone defect remains a challenge in trauma surgery. Few and heterogeneous cases have been reported about the treatment with the induced membrane technique.

methodsWe prospectively evaluated three patients treated with the induced membrane technique for acute Gustilo IIIB tibial fractures with critical bone defect. Success treatment was defined by bone union with patient pain free. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed regularly until healing, then annually and with a minimum follow-up of five years.

resultsIn all patients but one, a success was recorded, respectively, at four and six months. These two patients were pain free until the final follow-up, and no graft resorption or secondary complications related to the index surgery were observed. The third case was managed successfully with a bone transport technique.

conclusionThe induced membrane technique is an alternative good option for the treatment of these severe lesions.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone ResorptionBone TransplantationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFracture FixationFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, OpenHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurgical FlapsTibiaTibial FracturesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone defectBone reconstructionInduced membraneMasquelet techniqueOpen fracture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.