Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30279992›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2018

Assay validation and interspecific comparison of salivary glucocorticoids in three amphibian species.

Talisin T Hammond, Zoe A Au, Allison C Hartman, Corinne L Richards-Zawacki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Analysis of Reproductive Strategies and Immunological Interactions inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Why not both? A case study in measuring cortisol and corticosterone.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Talisin T HammondDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 105 Clapp Hall, 5th Ave. at Ruskin Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-8128
Zoe A AuDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 105 Clapp Hall, 5th Ave. at Ruskin Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Allison C HartmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 105 Clapp Hall, 5th Ave. at Ruskin Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Corinne L Richards-ZawackiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 105 Clapp Hall, 5th Ave. at Ruskin Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphibians are one of the most threatened groups of species, facing stressors ranging from habitat degradation and pollution to disease and overexploitation. Stress hormones (glucocorticoids, GCs) provide one quantitative metric of stress, and developing non-invasive methods for measuring GCs in amphibians would clarify how diverse environmental stressors impact individual health in this taxonomic group. Saliva is an advantageous matrix for quantifying GCs, as it is sampled less invasively than plasma while still detecting both baseline and acute elevation of GCs within a short timeframe. Little work has employed this method in amphibian species, and it has never been pharmacologically and biologically validated. Here, we conduct analytical, pharmacological and biological validation experiments for measuring salivary corticosterone in three amphibian species: the American bullfrog (

Indexed as

ACTHhandlingnon-invasivesalivastress

Identifiers

PMID30279992
PMCPMC6158758
OpenAlexW2892573019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.