ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2017
A case of in-stent restenosis with pathologically proven chronic inflammation seven years after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated interpretation of the coronary angioscopy with deep convolutional neural networks.Open heart · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 67-year-old man was admitted to our hospital due to chest pain at rest. Seven years previously, the patient underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the left ascending artery and implanted sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). Coronary angioscopy (CAS) performed at that time showed a white plaque at the SES site. Two years after the first PCI, repeat CAS demonstrated light yellow plaques at the SES site. At the time of his presentation to our hospital, coronary angiography showed in-stent restenosis at the SES site, and CAS demonstrated the plaque rupture with presence of dense yellow plaque and various thrombi. After distal protection, drug-eluting balloon treatment was performed. Collected specimens from culprit sites included foamy macrophages, cholesterin crystals, neutrophils, and fibrin, suggesting that progressive neoatherosclerosis at the SES site triggered the acute coronary syndrome. This study highlights the importance of ensuring careful patient follow-up after SES implantation. <
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.