Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30279741›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2018

MRI and histological evaluation of pulsed focused ultrasound and microbubbles treatment effects in the brain.

Zsofia I Kovacs, Tsang-Wei Tu, Maggie Sundby, Farhan Qureshi, Bobbi K Lewis, Neekita Jikaria, Scott R Burks, Joseph A Frank

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Neurological glycogen storage diseases and emerging therapeutics.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Application of Ultrasound Combined with Microbubbles for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A review of bioeffects induced by focused ultrasound combined with microbubbles on the neurovascular unit.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zsofia I KovacsFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda.
Tsang-Wei TuFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda.
Maggie SundbyFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda.
Farhan QureshiFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda.
Bobbi K LewisFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda.
Neekita JikariaFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda.
Scott R BurksFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda.
Joseph A FrankFrank Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USHoward University · USNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering · US

Funding

Research_ProjectU54HD090257 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2016 to 2020
$5.9M
Preclinical high intensity focused ultrasound: mechanisms and applicationsZIACL040014 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI FRANK, JOSEPH · 2009 to 2025
$0k
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) combined with microbubbles (MB) contrast agent infusion has been shown to transiently disrupt the blood-brain barrier (BBBD), increasing the delivery of neurotherapeutics to treat central nervous system (CNS) diseases. pFUS interaction with the intravascular MB results in acoustic cavitation forces passing through the neurovascular unit (NVU), inducing BBBD detected on contrast-enhanced MRI. Multiple pFUS+MB exposures in Alzheimer's disease (AD) models are being investigated as a method to clear amyloid plaques by activated microglia or infiltrating immune cells. Since it has been reported that pFUS+MB can induce a sterile inflammatory response (SIR) [1-5] in the rat, the goal of this study was to investigate the potential long-term effects of SIR in the brain following single and six weekly sonications by serial high-resolution MRI and pathology.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexHippocampusHistocytochemistryLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicrobubblesRats, Sprague-DawleyUltrasonographyblood-brain barrierhyperphosphorylated Taumicrobubblespulsed focused ultrasoundsterile inflammation

Identifiers

PMID30279741
PMCPMC6160777
OpenAlexW2890432499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.