ArticleIranian journal of child neurology2018
Comparison of the Effect of Phenobarbital versus Sodium Valproate in Management of Children with Status Epilepticus.
Article in Iranian journal of child neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Fundamentals of Antiseizure Medications: A Through Z.Epilepsy currents · 2024Article
- [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee.Epilepsy currents · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAcute prolonged seizure is the most common neurological emergency in children. This research was conducted to compare the effect of intravenous phenobarbital and Sodium valproate in control of seizure in children with status epilepticus, referred to emergency ward from Mar to Nov 2013. MATERIALS &
methodsIn this randomized clinical trial, registered with the code number IRCT2015051722300N1, 80 children aged 6 months to 10 years with prolonged seizure and with no response to one dose of diazepam (0.2 mg/kg) administered through IV injection during the five min were selected. Children were randomly divided into two groups, intervention, and control through permutation blocks. In intervention group, intravenous Sodium valproate (20 mg/kg) and in control group, intravenous phenobarbital (20 mg/kg) were prescribed. Data such as age, gender, history of previous seizure, seizure type, and recovery time after receiving drug was recorded in the form. Data analysis was done through descriptive statistics, Chi-square and Independent
resultsTwo groups were the same in terms of age and gender and had no statistically significant difference, but they were different in terms of seizure type. In valproate group, 18 patients (45%) and in phenobarbital group, 32 patients (80%) had positive response to the treatment and the chi-square test showed the significant difference.
conclusionWith regards to this point that in phenobarbital group, patients had more rapid response to drug in comparison with patients in Sodium valproate group, phenobarbital is a suitable and effective drug for controlling of seizure in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30279711PMC6160621W2569131752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.