Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30279668›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

The Use of Local and Global Ordering Strategies in Number Line Estimation in Early Childhood.

Jaccoline E Van 't Noordende, M J M Volman, Paul P M Leseman, Korbinian Moeller, Tanja Dackermann, Evelyn H Kroesbergen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaccoline E Van 't NoordendeDepartment of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
M J M VolmanDepartment of Special Education: Cognitive and Motor Disabilities, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Paul P M LesemanDepartment of Special Education: Cognitive and Motor Disabilities, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Korbinian MoellerLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.
Tanja DackermannLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.
Evelyn H KroesbergenBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lot of research has been devoted to number line estimation in primary school. However, less is known about the early onset of number line estimation before children enter formal education. We propose that ordering strategies are building blocks of number line estimation in early childhood. In a longitudinal study, children completed a non-symbolic number line estimation task at age 3.5 and 5 years. Two ordering strategies were identified based on the children's estimation patterns: local and global ordering. Local ordering refers to the correct ordering of successive quantities, whereas global ordering refers to the correct ordering of all quantities across the number line. Results indicated a developmental trend for both strategies. The percentage of children applying local and global ordering strategies increased steeply from 3.5 to 5 years of age. Moreover, children used more advanced local and global ordering strategies at 5 years of age. Importantly, level of strategy use was related to more traditional number line estimation outcome measures, such as estimation accuracy and regression fit scores. These results provide evidence that children use dynamic ordering strategies when solving the number line estimation task in early stages of numerical development.

Indexed as

global orderinglocal orderingnumber line estimationnumerical developmentstrategy use

Identifiers

PMID30279668
PMCPMC6153329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.