Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30279484›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Drug screening of biopsy-derived spheroids using a self-generated microfluidic concentration gradient.

Theresa Mulholland, Milly McAllister, Samantha Patek, David Flint, Mark Underwood, Alexander Sim, Joanne Edwards, Michele Zagnoni

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Engineering Heterogeneous Tumor Models for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Theresa MulhollandCentre for Microsystems and Photonics, Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XW, UK.
Milly McAllisterInstitute of Cancer Science, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK.
Samantha PatekInstitute of Cancer Science, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK.
David FlintStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0RE, UK.
Mark UnderwoodDepartment of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK.
Alexander SimAMS Biotechnology (Europe) Ltd, Milton Park, Abingdon, OX14 4SE, UK.
Joanne EdwardsInstitute of Cancer Science, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-6906
Michele ZagnoniCentre for Microsystems and Photonics, Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XW, UK. michele.zagnoni@strath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3198-9491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performing drug screening of tissue derived from cancer patient biopsies using physiologically relevant 3D tumour models presents challenges due to the limited amount of available cell material. Here, we present a microfluidic platform that enables drug screening of cancer cell-enriched multicellular spheroids derived from tumour biopsies, allowing extensive anticancer compound screening prior to treatment. This technology was validated using cell lines and then used to screen primary human prostate cancer cells, grown in 3D as a heterogeneous culture from biopsy-derived tissue. The technology enabled the formation of repeatable drug concentration gradients across an array of spheroids without external fluid actuation, delivering simultaneously a range of drug concentrations to multiple sized spheroids, as well as replicates for each concentration. As proof-of-concept screening, spheroids were generated from two patient biopsies and a panel of standard-of-care compounds for prostate cancer were tested. Brightfield and fluorescence images were analysed to provide readouts of spheroid growth and health, as well as drug efficacy over time. Overall, this technology could prove a useful tool for personalised medicine and future drug development, with the potential to provide cost- and time-reduction in the healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesAntineoplastic AgentsBiopsyDrug DevelopmentDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidicsNeoplasmsPrimary Cell CultureProof of Concept StudyReproducibility of ResultsSpheroids, CellularTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30279484
PMCPMC6168499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.