ArticleMedicine2018
Sonographic diagnosis of colorectal polyps in children: Diagnostic accuracy and multi-factor combination evaluation.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of saline-aided ultrasound in the detection of colorectal polyps in children.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Is There a Role for Intestinal Ultrasound in Polyp Detection?ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Successful detection and removal of predictable juvenile polyp: a case report.Annals of coloproctology · 2023Article
- Faecal calprotectin and ultrasonography as non-invasive screening tools for detecting colorectal polyps in children with sporadic rectal bleeding: a prospective study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2020Article
- Diagnostic performance of ultrasound without any colon preparation for detecting colorectal polyps in pediatric patients.Pediatric radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was established to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography in screening colorectal polyps in children and to discuss the necessity of colonic preparation before an ultrasonic examination.In this study, 288 children with colorectal polyps managed at our hospital between January 2007 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were examined before and after basic colon preparation. The colorectal polyps were confirmed by colonoscopy/laparotomy and histopathology. Among all 288 patients, solitary polyps were identified in 278 patients (96.52%), and multiple polyps were identified in 10 patients (43 polyps) (3.48%) by colonoscopy/laparotomy and histopathology.By ultrasonic examination, 264 cases (264/278) were detected as solitary polyp and 9 cases (9/10) as multiple polyps (31 polyps). In 278 solitary polyps, 180 (64.74%) were detected by ultrasonic examination without a colon preparation. Following glycerine enema (10-20 mL) treatment, 264 (94.96%) cases were detected by ultrasonic examination. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography with glycerine enema for the detection of colorectal polyps were 94.96% and 100%, respectively. Colon preparation significantly increased the proportion of polyps identified by ultrasonography (P < .0001), as well as the diagnostic rate of polyps in rectum, sigmoid colon and descending colon (P < .05).Ultrasonography can be the primary diagnostic method for screening colorectal polyps in children on the strength of its safety, validity, and accuracy. Basic colon preparation with glycerine enema is recommended for children, which enable the detection of intraluminal lesions before ultrasonic examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.