ArticleMedicine2018
Correlations of DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score with the extent of coronary stenosis in acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of PRECİSE DAPT Score on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in MINOCA Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessing the Utility of the DAPT Score and PRECISE-DAPT Score in Determining the Appropriateness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction/Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Predictive value of PRECISE-DAPT score for long-term all-cause mortality in atrial fibrillation patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023Article
- Risk Stratification of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Risk prediction of bleeding and MACCE by PRECISE-DAPT score post-PCI.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021Article
- Relationship of Gensini score with retinal vessel diameter and arteriovenous ratio in senile CHD.Open life sciences · 2021Article
- Contradictions between DAPT and PRECISE-DAPT scores with the severity of coronary lesion in acute coronary syndrome.Medicine · 2020Observational
- Update on Antithrombotic Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score and PRECISE-DAPT score were recommended for decision making of optimal DAPT in discriminating the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. But the relationships between 2 scoring tools with the extent of coronary stenosis have not been established.We retrospectively enrolled 359 patients of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who received percutaneous coronary intervention. Both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score were calculated, and patients were divided by their recommended cut-offs. Gensini score and triple-vessel disease (3-VD) were chosen to evaluate the severity of coronary stenosis.Overall, 54.9% and 10.0% of the patients had higher DAPT score (≥2) or PRECISE-DAPT score (≥25). Patients with higher DAPT score had increased stent counts, total length of stents, Gensini score, and proportion of 3-VD, but decreased minimum diameter of stent. But these differences were not found in PRECISE-DAPT subgroups. When divided into quartiles of both scoring systems, the highest Gensini score and proportions of 3-VD were found in the fourth quartile of both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score. Moreover, both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score were independent risk factors of Gensini score after adjustment (P < .001 and P = .047). Furthermore, an increase of 1 point of DAPT score and 5 points of PRECISE-DAPT score resulted by 51% (odds ratios [OR]: 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.19-1.91, P = .001) and 34% (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11-1.62, P = .003) increase in risk of 3-VD after adjustment.Both DAPT score and PRECISE-DAPT score were independently associated with the degree of coronary stenosis in patients with ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.