Observational studyMedicine2018
The reasons and clinical treatments of postoperative relapse of Pott's disease.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical correction of severe cervical kyphosis secondary to tuberculoid Pott's disease: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Subjacent Disease in an Operated Case of Spinal Tuberculosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2023Article
- Surgical management of consecutive multisegment thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis: anterior-only approach vs. posterior-only approach.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Literature about postoperative relapse of Pott's disease is rare. Accordingly, the risk factors and clinical treatments for postoperative relapse of Pott's disease remain controversial. In order to evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of postoperative Pott's disease relapse, and to investigate its optimal therapeutic procedures with respect to focal characteristics, we performed a retrospective review of clinical and radiographic data that were prospectively collected between July 2008 and May 2014 from 753 consecutive spinal tubercular patients including 67 patients who were diagnosed and treated as postoperative relapse of Pott's disease in our hospital. Apart from 9 patients being treated conservatively, the remaining 58 cases received surgery in our series. Specifically, 12 cases underwent anterior debridement, interbody fusion with instrumentation; 15 cases received posterior instrumentation anterior debridement, and bone grafting; 10 cases underwent posterior decompression, bone grafting, and instrumentation; 7 cases with debridement, 5 with debridement and sinus resection. Nine cases received percutaneous drainage and low-dose local continuous chemotherapy. Clinical outcomes before and after treatment were evaluated with statistical analysis based on hematologic and radiographic examinations, bone fusion, and neurologic status. Patients were followed-up for a mean of 39.2 ± 8.2 months (range, 24-60 months). Postoperatively, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) became normal within 4-6 months in all patients, and solid bone fusion was achieved within 8 months. Patients exhibited significant improvements in neurological deficits postoperatively, while the visual analog scale for pain showed significant improvements in all patients at final follow-up. The outcomes of follow-up showed that the reasons for postoperative relapse of Pott's disease were multiple. Individualized therapeutic methods should be chosen in accordance with the patient's general condition, recurrence focal characteristic, surgeon's experience, but above all is administration of appropriate chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.