Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30278503›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: A systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires.

Erwin C Baars, Ernst Schrier, Pieter U Dijkstra, Jan H B Geertzen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Methods to assess lower limb prosthetic adaptation: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. A review of user needs to drive the development of lower limb prostheses.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Measuring satisfaction with orthotic and prosthetic devices.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reconstruction of the Tibial Stump After Fibulectomy.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Satisfaction With Department of Veterans Affairs Prosthetics and Support Services as Reported by Women and Men Veterans.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Erwin C BaarsVogellanden, Center for Rehabilitation, Zwolle.
Ernst SchrierDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation.
Pieter U DijkstraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation.
Jan H B GeertzenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation.
National Rehabilitation Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFactors influencing patient satisfaction with a transtibial prosthesis have been studied fragmentarily. The aims of this systematic review were to review the literature regarding factors of influence on patient satisfaction with a transtibial prosthesis, to report satisfaction scores, to present an overview of questionnaires used to assess satisfaction and examine how these questionnaires operationalize satisfaction.

methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Knowledge databases up to February 2018 to identify relevant studies.

resultsTwelve of 1832 studies met the inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 14 to 581 participants, mean age ranged from 18 to 70 years, and time since amputation ranged from 3 to 39 years. Seven questionnaires assessed different aspects of satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was influenced by appearance, properties, fit, and use of the prosthesis, as well as aspects of the residual limb. These influencing factors were not relevant for all amputee patients and were related to gender, etiology, liner use, and level of amputation. No single factor was found to significantly influence satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Significant associations were found between satisfaction and gender, etiology, liner use, and level of amputation.

conclusionRelevance of certain factors for satisfaction was related to specific amputee patient groups. Questionnaires assessing satisfaction use different operationalizations, making comparisons between studies difficult.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmputation, SurgicalArtificial LimbsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProsthesis ImplantationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30278503
PMCPMC6181602
OpenAlexW2895611010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.