Trial reportMedicine2018
The effect of dexmedetomidine in coracoid approach brachial plexus block under dual stimulation.
Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02961361 (the Effect of Dexmedetomidine in Coracoid Approach Brachial Plexus Block), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
the Effect of Dexmedetomidine in Coracoid Approach Brachial Plexus Block
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal dose of perineural dexmedetomidine to prolong analgesia after brachial plexus blockade: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of 57 randomized clinical trials.BMC anesthesiology · 2021Pooled it
- Dexmedetomidine versus sufentanil as adjuvants to bupivacaine for brachial plexus block during upper extremity surgery: a randomized clinical trial.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoracoid approach brachial plexus block (CABPB) is safe and effective for clinical anesthesia and analgesia. Dual stimulation can enhance the block effect of CABPB when using nerve stimulator. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-adrenoceptor agonist and it can prolong the duration of anesthesia when it is added into local anesthetics. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of dexmedetomidine on the duration of anesthesia and the effective postoperative analgesia time when it was mixed with ropivacaine for CABPB under dual stimulation.
methodsA total of 60 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups (groups D and C), 30 patients in each group. CABPB were guided by nerve stimulator under dual stimulation. Each patient received 40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine (group C), or 40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine mixed with 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (group D). The duration of anesthesia, the effective postoperative analgesia time, sensory and motor block onset time, visual analog scale (VAS), and the cumulative dose of rescue tramadol were recorded.
resultsTwenty-eight patients in each group were analyzed. The duration of anesthesia was longer in group D as compared with group C (759 vs 634 minutes, P < .05) and the effective postoperative analgesia time was longer in group D as compared with group C (986 vs 789 minutes, P < .05) too. The onset time of sensory and motor blocks were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > .05). The VAS was similar in the 2 groups at 6 and 12 hours after block (P > .05), but it was lower in group D at 24 hours after block as compared to group C (P < .05). The cumulative dose of rescue tramadol during the first 48 hours postoperative period was significantly lower in group D as compared to group C (P < .05). No significant changes were observed in vital signs in either group.
conclusionThe addition of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine extends the duration of anesthesia and the effective postoperative analgesia time for CABPB under dual stimulation. The VAS at 24 hours after block and the demand for rescue tramadol during the first 48 hours postoperative period are lower as well without side effects in the study group.(Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov id. NCT02961361).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.