Observational studyMedicine2018
Assessment of treatment outcomes in patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma (stages III-IV): Clinical significance of interventional therapy.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Palliative surgery: state of the science and future directions.The British journal of surgery · 2024Article
- [Application of 3D visualization and 3D printing in individualized precision surgery for Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲ and Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020Article
- Diagnostic-therapeutic management of bile duct cancer.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical significance of palliative interventional therapy in the management of patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA; stages III-IV) has yet to be studied. The present work was aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of the patients treated with surgery or interventional therapy.A total of 90 patients with advanced HCCA, who admitted Fuyang First People's Hospital from May 2015 to February 2016, were enrolled. Forty-five of them were assigned to the experimental group receiving biliary drainage as the interventional therapy, and the remaining 45 patients were designated as the conventional group receiving radical/palliative surgery. Before and after the treatment total bilirubin from blood was measured. The length of treatment and medical cost were also examined. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year after the treatment.For both the experimental and conventional groups, the serum bilirubin levels after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment (P < .05); however, no significant differences between groups were seen. There were no significant differences between experimental and conventional groups in the incidence of postoperative complications and survival outcomes. Of note, the length of treatment of the experimental group was substantially shorter than that of the conventional group (P < .05). The medical expense of the experimental group was only about one-third of that of the conventional group (P < .05).Although the interventional therapy does not improve patients' survivals and reduce the incidence of complications, it significantly shortens the treatment length, reducing substantially the medical expense. This finding provides new insights into the treatment strategy for patients with advanced HCCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.