Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30278180›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes2018

Distribution of mechanical stress in the Escherichia coli cell envelope.

Hyea Hwang, Nicolò Paracini, Jerry M Parks, Jeremy H Lakey, James C Gumbart

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Minimalist Model Lipid System Mimicking the Biophysical Properties ofLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Contact Area and Deformation ofLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Physical properties of the bacterial outer membrane.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Potential Inhibitors TargetingIndian journal of microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyea HwangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA; Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.
Nicolò ParaciniCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom.
Jerry M ParksBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.
Jeremy H LakeyCentre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jeremy.lakey@ncl.ac.uk.
James C GumbartSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. Electronic address: gumbart@physics.gatech.edu.
Newcastle University · GBOak Ridge National Laboratory · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Transport across two membranes by AcrAB-TolC complexR01AI052293 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI ZGURSKAYA, HELEN I · 2003 to 2024
$7.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell envelope in Gram-negative bacteria comprises two distinct membranes with a cell wall between them. There has been a growing interest in understanding the mechanical adaptation of this cell envelope to the osmotic pressure (or turgor pressure), which is generated by the difference in the concentration of solutes between the cytoplasm and the external environment. However, it remains unexplored how the cell wall, the inner membrane (IM), and the outer membrane (OM) effectively protect the cell from this pressure by bearing the resulting surface tension, thus preventing the formation of inner membrane bulges, abnormal cell morphology, spheroplasts and cell lysis. In this study, we have used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations combined with experiments to resolve how and to what extent models of the IM, OM, and cell wall respond to changes in surface tension. We calculated the area compressibility modulus of all three components in simulations from tension-area isotherms. Experiments on monolayers mimicking individual leaflets of the IM and OM were also used to characterize their compressibility. While the membranes become softer as they expand, the cell wall exhibits significant strain stiffening at moderate to high tensions. We integrate these results into a model of the cell envelope in which the OM and cell wall share the tension at low turgor pressure (0.3 atm) but the tension in the cell wall dominates at high values (>1 atm).

Indexed as

Stress, MechanicalCell MembraneCell WallEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMolecular Dynamics SimulationOsmotic PressureEscherichia coli ProteinsArea compressibilityBacterial cell wallLipopolysaccharidesMembrane mechanicsTurgor pressure

Identifiers

PMID30278180
PMCPMC6203649
OpenAlexW2893857764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.