Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30278054›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Leprosy in children under 15 years of age in Brazil: A systematic review of the literature.

Michelle Christini Araújo Vieira, Joilda Silva Nery, Enny S Paixão, Kaio Vinicius Freitas de Andrade, Gerson Oliveira Penna, Maria Glória Teixeira

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. BCG vaccination: Effects on the patterns of pediatric leprosy.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle Christini Araújo VieiraNursing School, Federal University of the Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7771-5387
Joilda Silva NeryInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1576-6418
Enny S PaixãoDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-908X
Kaio Vinicius Freitas de AndradeInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4603-9109
Gerson Oliveira PennaTropical Medicine Center, Brasília University, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-536X
Maria Glória TeixeiraInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, UFBA, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3318-3408
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMinistério da Saúde · BRUniversidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco · BR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/N017250/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeprosy is a chronic infectious disease neglected, caused by Mycobacterium leprae, considered a public health problem because may cause permanent physical disabilities and deformities, leading to severe limitations. This review presents an overview of the results of epidemiological studies on leprosy occurrence in childhood in Brazil, aiming to alert health planners and managers to the actual need to institute special control strategies. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsData collection consisted of an electronic search for publications in eight databases: Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), PuBMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), SciVerse Scopus (Scopus), CAPES theses database, CAPES journals database and Web of Science of papers published up to 2016. After apply selection criteria, twenty-two papers of studies conducted in four different regions of Brazil and published between 2001 and 2016 were included in the review. The leprosy detection rate ranged from 10.9 to 78.4 per 100,000 inhabitants. Despite affecting both sexes, leprosy was more common in boys and in 10-14-year-olds. Although the authors reported a high cure proportion (82-90%), between 1.7% and 5.5% of the individuals developed a disability resulting from the disease. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The findings of this review shows that leprosy situation in Brazilian children under 15 years is extremely adverse in that the leprosy detection rate remains high in the majority of studies. The proportion of cases involving disability is also high and reflects the difficulties and the poor effectiveness of actions aimed at controlling the disease. The authors suggest the development of studies in spatial clusters of leprosy, where beyond the routine actions established, are included news strategies of active search and campaigns and actions of educations inside the clusters of this disease. The new agenda needs to involve the precepts of ethical, humane and supportive care, in order to achieve a new level of leprosy control in Brazil.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLeprosyMalePrevalenceSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID30278054
PMCPMC6168122
OpenAlexW2894946677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.