Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30277895›Full record

Observational studyPediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2018

Performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 Score in PICUs in Argentina: A Prospective, National Multicenter Study.

María Del P Arias López, Nancy Boada, Analía Fernández, Ariel L Fernández, María E Ratto, Alejandro Siaba Serrate, Eduardo Schnitzler, Members of VALIDARPIM3 Argentine Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of Performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM)-2 and PIM-3 Scores in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a High Complexity Institution.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Does Pediatric Index of Mortality "Score" in Colombia?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

María Del P Arias LópezHospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Nancy BoadaHospital de Pediatría "Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan," Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Analía FernándezHospital General de Agudos "Carlos G. Durand," Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ariel L FernándezSociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María E RattoHospital de Niños Sor María Ludovica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Alejandro Siaba SerrateHospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eduardo SchnitzlerHospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Members of VALIDARPIM3 Argentine Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 score in a population of children admitted to PICUs in Argentina.

designProspective, national, multicenter study.

settingForty-nine PICUs located in Argentina belonging to public and private institutions. PATIENTS: All children between 1 month and 16 years old admitted to the participating PICUs between May 15, 2016, and February 15, 2017.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN

resultsA total of 6,602 patients were enrolled in the study. The observed mortality was 8% (531/6,602), whereas mortality predicted by Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 was 6.16% (407 deaths). The standardized mortality rate was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.20-1.42). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.82-0.85). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the difference between the mortality observed and the mortality predicted by Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 was statistically significant (χ, 135.63; p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 score adequately discriminated patients who died from those who survived in our population. However, the observed mortality was higher than predicted by the score. The use of an updated instrument such as Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 will allow an actual comparison between pediatric intensive care provided in the country and care provided internationally. This might also allow future planning of pediatric intensive care services in Argentina.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityQuality Indicators, Health CareAdolescentAge DistributionArea Under CurveArgentinaChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30277895
PMCPMC6282682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.