Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30277663›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2018

A shared effect of paroxetine treatment on gray matter volume in depressive patients with and without childhood maltreatment: A voxel-based morphometry study.

Xiao-Wen Lu, Hua Guo, Jing-Rong Sun, Qiang-Li Dong, Fu-Tao Zhao, Xu-Hong Liao, Li Zhang, Yan Zhang, Wei-Hui Li, Ze-Xuan Li and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Predictive MRI Biomarkers in MS-A Critical Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Imaging connectomics in depression.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xiao-Wen LuMental Health Institute, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-2272
Hua GuoZhumadian Psychiatry Hospital, Zhumadian, China.
Jing-Rong SunMental Health Institute, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qiang-Li DongMental Health Institute, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Fu-Tao ZhaoZhumadian Psychiatry Hospital, Zhumadian, China.
Xu-Hong LiaoState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Li ZhangMental Health Institute, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yan ZhangMental Health Institute, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wei-Hui LiMental Health Institute, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ze-Xuan LiMental Health Institute, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Tie-Bang LiuShenzhen Mental Health Center, Shenzhen, China.
Yong HeState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Ming-Rui XiaState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Ling-Jiang LiMental Health Institute, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study assessed whether antidepressant drug treatment has a common effect on gray matter (GM) volume in MDD patients with and without childhood maltreatment (CM).

methodsT1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging data were collected from 168 participants, including 51 MDD patients with CM, 31 MDD patients without CM, 48 normal controls with CM, and 38 normal controls without CM. MDD patients received 6 months of treatment with paroxetine, and 24 patients with CM, and 16 patients without CM received a second MRI scan. A whole-brain voxel-based morphometry approach was used to estimate GM volume in each participant at two time points. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effects of MDD and CM on GM volume at baseline. Repeated measures two-way ANOVA was used to determine the treatment-by-CM interactive effect and main effect of treatment during paroxetine treatment. We further investigated the relationship between GM volume and clinical variables.

resultsAt baseline, significant MDD-by-CM interactive effects on GM volume were mainly observed in the left parahippocampal gyrus, left entorhinal cortex, and left cuneus. GM volume was significantly lower mainly in the right middle temporal gyrus in patients with MDD than in normal controls. We did not find any significant treatment-by-CM interactive effects. However, a treatment-related increase in GM was found in the right middle temporal gyrus in both MDD groups.

conclusionsThese results suggest that paroxetine treatment operates via a shared neurobiological mechanism in MDD patients with and without CM.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationChildChild AbuseFemaleGray MatterHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMajor Depressive DisorderMaleParoxetinePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationParoxetineantidepressant drugchildhood stressdepressionfollow-upMRI

Identifiers

PMID30277663
PMCPMC6489845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.